SPiCE: a web-based tool for sequence-based protein classification and exploration

  • Bastiaan A van den Berg1, 3, 4Email author,

    Affiliated with

    • Marcel JT Reinders1, 3, 4,

      Affiliated with

      • Johannes A Roubos2, 3 and

        Affiliated with

        • Dick de Ridder1, 3, 4

          Affiliated with

          BMC Bioinformatics201415:93

          DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-93

          Received: 7 October 2013

          Accepted: 26 March 2014

          Published: 31 March 2014



          Amino acid sequences and features extracted from such sequences have been used to predict many protein properties, such as subcellular localization or solubility, using classifier algorithms. Although software tools are available for both feature extraction and classifier construction, their application is not straightforward, requiring users to install various packages and to convert data into different formats. This lack of easily accessible software hampers quick, explorative use of sequence-based classification techniques by biologists.


          We have developed the web-based software tool SPiCE for exploring sequence-based features of proteins in predefined classes. It offers data upload/download, sequence-based feature calculation, data visualization and protein classifier construction and testing in a single integrated, interactive environment. To illustrate its use, two example datasets are included showing the identification of differences in amino acid composition between proteins yielding low and high production levels in fungi and low and high expression levels in yeast, respectively.


          SPiCE is an easy-to-use online tool for extracting and exploring sequence-based features of sets of proteins, allowing non-experts to apply advanced classification techniques. The tool is available at http://​helix.​ewi.​tudelft.​nl/​spice.


          Sequence-based Data visualization and exploration Protein feature extraction Protein classification


          The sequence of a protein contains valuable information about its characteristics. Various sequence-based prediction methods exploit this to classify proteins according to specific properties, such as localization [1], function [2], or solubility [3]. This has resulted in relevant and frequently used bioinformatics tools [4] that are offered by a growing number of easily accessible websites and webservices [57].

          Sequence-based protein classifiers assign class labels to proteins based on a set of features, real numbers that capture some sequence property. This process entails three distinct steps. First, feature extraction is required to map protein sequences to points in a feature space (Figure 1A). Next, a classifier is constructed to optimally separate protein classes in this feature space (training, Figure 1B), using a set of proteins with known class labels. Finally, the trained classifier can be applied to predict class labels for new proteins (testing, Figure 1C). Additionally, features and feature distributions can be visualized to explore differences between protein classes by eye.
          Figure 1

          Protein classification. A) Feature extraction maps protein sequences to feature space. In this case, calculation of the sequence length (x-axis) and the relative frequency of occurrence of alanines (y-axis) map each protein sequence to a point in two-dimensional feature space. B) Classifier training using proteins with known class labels: class 1 (orange) and class 2 (green). After mapping to feature space, a classifier is trained to obtain a decision boundary (dashed line) that optimally separates the classes. C) Predicting class labels of new proteins using the trained classifier. After mapping to feature space, the point in feature space determines what label is assigned to the protein. Label class 1 will be assigned to the example protein, because of its location on the class 1 side of the decision boundary.

          Software tools are available for each of these three steps. Feature extraction is available as software package [8] and through web services [912] and an extensive range of classification software has been developed [13, 14], some of which include feature visualization [15]. However, combined application requires installing different software packages and programming efforts to convert data according to the requirements of each tool. For the construction of specialized high-performance classifiers, the overhead of deploying such a pipeline may be acceptable or even required, because this usually involves extensive exploration of many combinations of (customized) features, types of classifiers, and parameter settings. However, it precludes easy access to these methods for non-expert users.

          We set out to offer basic protein classification functionality in a single environment to allow for quick and easy exploration of user-defined protein classes, without the need for any programming, data conversion or software installation. To this end we introduce SPiCE, a web-based tool for Sequence-based Protein Classification and Exploration. SPiCE makes powerful data exploration techniques accessible to non-experts; additionally, expert bioinformaticians can exploit the back-end software to perform customized and/or computationally expensive tasks on a local computer.


          Before describing the SPiCE functionality, some classification concepts and the offered sequence-based features will be introduced in the following two sections.


          Classifiers are algorithms that assign discrete class labels to objects. These objects are typically represented as vectors of features, real numbers that reflect a property thought to be potentially different for proteins in the different classes. Protein sequences should therefore first be mapped onto such feature vectors, a process called feature extraction (Figure 1A). This should ideally result in a small number of discriminative features. In SPiCE, feature vectors are always normalized to zero mean and unit standard deviation.

          Given a training set of proteins with known labels, a classifier can then be trained, i.e. its parameters can be tuned to yield optimal performance (Figure 1B). For problems with two classes A and B, performance is often estimated based on a receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve. Such a curve represents all possible trade-offs between classifications of proteins in class A as being in class B and vice versa. If class A corresponds to “positive” and class B to “negative”, the ROC curve is traditionally drawn as false positive rate vs. true positive rate and the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is used as a measure of classifier performance, with 1 indicating perfect classification and 0.5 random classification. Once trained, the trained classifier can be used to predict the class label for any new protein, a process called testing (Figure 1C).

          To avoid overtraining, i.e. setting the parameters such that the training set is classified well but test samples will be classified poorly, a stratified cross-validation scheme is used. This entails splitting the training set in k parts reflecting the original class distributions (where the “fold” k is a parameter) and iteratively training classifiers on k−1 parts and estimating its performance on the remaining part. The average performance is then an estimate of the performance to be expected on new, unseen data.

          A large number of classification algorithms are available, differing in complexity and often applicable to specific problems. SPiCE implements the most well-known classifier types (see Table 1). In case the classifier has parameters, they are optimized in an inner k-fold cross-validation loop [16] using the parameter ranges in Table 1 as search grid, optimizing for the AUC.
          Table 1

          Offered classifiers with corresponding parameter ranges


          Parameter optimization grid

          SVM (linear kernel)


          SVM (RBF kernel)




          k-neighbors (unif.1)


          k-neighbors (dist.2)


          Nearest centroid


          LDA3 classifier


          QDA4 classifier


          Gaussian Naive Bayes


          Decision tree

          Default scikit-learn parameters

          Random forest

          Default scikit-learn parameters

          1uniform resp. 2distance-based neighbor weights, 3linear discriminant resp. 4quadratic discriminant analysis.

          For a more in depth discussion of classification and feature extraction, the reader is referred to relevant reviews [17, 18] or textbooks [19, 20]. Below, an overview of the specific features SPiCE extracts from protein sequences is given.

          Sequence-based features

          Table 2 lists the feature categories that can be calculated; these categories are briefly discussed below. More details can be found on the SPiCE documentation page (http://​helix.​ewi.​tudelft.​nl/​spice/​doc).
          Table 2

          Sequence-based feature categories

          Feature category


          Number of features

          Composition features


          AA composition

          Number of segments

          20× number of segments

          Dipeptide composition

          Number of segments

          400× number of segments

          Terminal end amino acid count

          N- or C-terminal end, length


          SS composition

          Number of segments

          3× number of segments

          Per SS class AA composition



          SA composition

          Number of segments

          2× number of segments

          Per SA class AA composition



          Codon composition



          Codon usage



          Protein length



          Property profile-based features


          Signal average

          AA scale(s), window, edge

          1 per AA scale

          Signal peaks area

          AA scale(s), window, edge, threshold

          2 per AA scale


          Type, AA scale(s), distance

          1 per AA scale

          Pseudo AA composition (type 1)

          AA scale(s), λ


          Pseudo AA composition (type 2)

          AA scale(s), λ


          Amino acid distance-based features


          Property CTD




          AA distance matrix, λ


          *AA: amino acid, SS: secondary structure, SA: solvent accessibility, CTD: composition, transition, distribution.

          Composition features

          These features calculate letter counts divided by sequence length for a number of sequence types: amino acid, codon, secondary structure, and solvent accessibility. The ‘number of segments’ parameter subdivides sequences into equal length parts and returns the composition of each segment separately. For the amino acid sequence, there is also the option to calculate the dipeptide composition, i.e. amino acid pair counts divided by sequence length −1, and the amino acid counts for a given length of the N- or C-terminal end of the protein sequence. For the codon sequence, the codon usage can be calculated.

          Property profile-based features

          Amino acid scales map each amino acid to a value that captures a physicochemical or biochemical property, such as hydropathicity or size. These scales are used to obtain a property profile for a protein sequence by mapping all of its residues to the corresponding values. The profiles are in turn used for calculating property profile-based features. The AAIndex data base [21] contains a large collection of scales that can be selected for feature calculation. Because the data base contains many correlated scales, a set of 19 uncorrelated scales derived from the entire AAIndex database [22] can also be selected. Amino acid scales are normalized (zero mean, unit standard deviation) before using them for feature calculation.

          • Signal average features capture, based on the selected amino acid scale used for generating a property profile, the average property over the entire protein sequence by calculating the average profile value.

          • Signal peaks area features use the property profiles to capture occurrences of property peaks by calculating the sum of all areas under a protein profile above and below a given threshold. A window and edge parameter define the width and edge weights of a triangular filter with which the profile is convoluted to smooth it before calculating the features [23].

          • Autocorrelation features employ the property profiles to calculate property correlations between two residues at a given distance over the entire protein sequence. As in profeat, three different types are implemented: normalized Moreau-Broto [24], Moran [25], and Geary [26].

          • Pseudo-amino acid composition features calculate the amino composition with additional features that include sequence-order information up to a given distance λ. Sequence-order information is incorporated by calculating residue correlation factors between two residues at a given distance over the entire protein sequence, for distances 1,2,…,λ. The correlation factors are based on one or multiple user-defined amino acid scales as offered by the PseAAC web server [10]. Both the parallel-correlation type (type 1), as introduced in [27] for predicting protein cellular attributes, and the series-correlation type (type 2), as introduced in [28] for predicting enzyme subfamilies, are offered by SPiCE.

          Amino acid distance-based features

          These feature categories use amino acid distances for feature calculation, either by using a amino acid distance matrix or by using predefined amino acid clusters.

          • Property composition, transition, distribution (CTD) features were previously used to predict protein folding classes [29]. Our implementation is based on profeat[12]. The twenty amino acids are subdivided into three groups; A, B, and C, based on a given property. Protein sequences are then mapped to the reduced three-letter alphabet (ABC), which are used to calculate i) the property composition, letter counts divided by sequence length, ii) property transitions, the number of AB and BA transitions divided by the sequence length - 1 (likewise for AC and BC), and iii) the property distribution, relative protein sequence positions of the first occurrence, the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quantile, and the last occurrence of each property letter. The used properties – hydrophobicity, normalized Van der Waals volume, polarity, polarizibility, charge, secondary structures and solvent accessibility – and corresponding amino acid subdivisions are the same as in profeat.

          • Quasi-sequence-order descriptors have been used to predict protein subcellular localization [30]. They are comparable to the pseudo amino acid composition, but the Schneider-Wrede amino acid distance matrix [31] is used for calculating correlation factors instead of amino acid scales.


          SPiCE has four main functionalities, as illustrated in Figure 2. First, users can upload a FASTA file with protein sequences for which a range of sequence based features can be calculated (Figure 2A). The resulting feature matrix (Figure 2B) can then be visually explored using histograms, scatter plots, and heat maps. Classifiers can be trained for a set of user-defined class labels (Figure 2C) and the resulting classifier can finally be used to predict class labels of new protein sequences (Figure 2D).
          Figure 2

          Overview of the four main functionalities. A) Sequence-based feature extraction, mapping each protein in a FASTA file to a list of feature values (a row in the feature matrix). The uploaded protein labels will be used for classifier construction. B) Visual inspection of the calculated feature data, in this example showing (part of) the feature matrix in the form of a clustered heat map with in each row the feature values of one protein and the corresponding protein labels in the rightmost column. C) Classifier construction using the calculated feature matrix and the provided labels (train data). A k-fold cross-validation protocol is used to assess classification performance. D) The trained classifier can be used to predict class labels for a set of new proteins (test data).

          To access these functions, the SPiCE web-based user interface offers four areas: home, projects, features, and classification, accessible through the main tabs. The web application can be freely explored without registration. A user account bar – situated directly underneath the main tabs (Figure 3) – enables users to login to their account or to create a new account, providing them with a secure personal work space in which their projects will be stored.
          Figure 3

          SPiCE screenshot.

          Home contains general information and news items. Additional documentation and tutorials can be accessed through the documentation link in the header menu at the top of the page (Figure 3).

          Projects are initiated by uploading a FASTA file with either protein (amino acid) or ORF (nucleotide) sequences. After initiation, one or more labeling files can be uploaded in which each protein is assigned a label, for example its subcellular localization. Users can also upload (predicted) secondary structure and solvent accessibility sequences, which enables the calculation of additional features.

          Features can be calculated for all proteins in the project. A list of available sequence-based features is given in Table 2. Additionally, users can upload their own calculated features. The resulting feature matrix can be explored using different visualizations. Feature-value distributions and class separation can be explored using histograms (e.g. like in Figure 3) and scatter plots. Another way of exploring predictive features is to visually inspect the feature matrix using a hierarchically clustered heat map (Figure 2B), in which the protein labels are added as an extra column (not used for clustering).

          Classification offers the ability to train classifiers using the proteins in the current project. Users can select: i) the type of classifier to use, ii) the classes to train for, iii) the features to use for training, and iv) the number of cross-validation loops k. A (double) k-fold cross-validation protocol is used to assess classifier performance and to optimize classifier parameters if required. After training, a table with performance measures is reported, together with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in case of two-class classification. The final classifier is trained on the entire train set using the optimized parameter settings. Trained classifiers can be applied to predict class labels of new proteins by selecting any of the user’s projects, in which case class labels will be predicted for each protein in that project.

          Software framework

          The website is developed in Python 2.7.3 (http://​www.​python.​org), using the minimalist python web framework CherryPy 3.2.0 (http://​www.​cherrypy.​org). The back-end uses the Python package spice for feature calculation and classification. Within this package, the featext module manages feature extraction using a dataset module to manage protein sequence data and a featmat module to manage the labeled feature matrix. The classification module offers a set of classification tasks, which basically is a layer on top of the machine learning software scikit-learn 0.14.1 [14]. Feature extraction and classification tasks are put in a job queue which is handled by a separate compute server.

          Results and discussion

          To validate the system, we reproduced results of previous work in which a data set was employed to construct classifiers predicting successful high-level production of extracellular proteins in Aspergillus niger[32]. The used data set consists of 345 secretory proteins that were over-expressed in A. niger and tested for detectable extracellular concentrations by putting the obtained extracellular medium on a gel after growing the culture in shake flask. A label ‘high’ was assigned to proteins for which a band on the gel was observed and a label ‘low’ to the others, resulting in 167 high-level and 178 low-level proteins. This labeled protein set can be loaded as an example project in SPiCE.

          The amino acid composition was calculated and used for the construction of a linear support vector machine (10-fold double-loop cross-validation), providing results that are in agreement with the results described earlier [32]. Similar to the observations in that work, the t-statistics reveal strong predictive capacity for the tyrosine, asparagine, arginine, and lysine features (Additional file 1: Figure S1), which can also be observed in the histograms (Additional file 1: Figure S2). The scatter plot in Figure 4 shows the obtained class separation by using the two features with the lowest (negative) and highest t-value respectively. For the hierarchically clustered feature matrix in Figure 5, clustering of proteins (rows) with the same label indicate that these features are useful for classification. Classifier construction resulted in a cross-validation performance of 0.837 area under the ROC curve (Additional file 1: Figure S4), again similar to results obtained in [32].
          Figure 4

          Scatter plot showing class separation for the A. niger secretion project using the amino acid composition features with the lowest (negative) and highest t -value, arginine and asparagine respectively.

          Figure 5

          Hierarchically clustered feature matrix of the A. niger secretion project with the amino acid composition features as columns and the proteins as rows. The corresponding class labels, gray for ‘low’ and white for ‘high’, are shown in the column on the right.

          Additionally, we used a yeast protein expression data set to illustrate the ease with which one can explore differences between user-defined protein classes. For this data set, yeast proteins were split into low-level and high-level expressed based on data found in [33], in which Saccharomyces cerevisiae open reading frames were tagged with a high-affinity epitopes and expressed from their natural chromosomal location after which protein abundances were measured during log-phase growth by immunodetection of the tag. As a pre-processing step, to avoid a bias for sets with highly similar proteins, BLASTCLUST[34] was used to reduce sequence redundancy. After that the list of proteins was ordered by expression level. The top and bottom 1000 proteins were labeled ‘high’ and ‘low’ respectively. This data is also available as an example project.

          Using the t-statistics table in Figure 6, quick exploration of the amino acid composition reveals a preference for alanine, valine, and glycine in the high-expression class, whereas low-expression proteins contain relatively many asparagines and serines. The alanine and serine histograms in Figure 7, the features with minimal and maximal t-value respectively, indeed show shifted means of the class distributions. A classification performance, again using a linear support vector machine and 10-fold cross-validation, of 0.794 area under the ROC-curve (Additional file 1: Figure S8) showed good predictive capability of the amino acid composition. The predictive capability using the codon composition proved even better, resulting in a performance of 0.856 area under the ROC-curve (Figure 8).
          Figure 6

          Table with t -statistics of the yeast expression-level project. The table shows the t-statistics for the amino acid composition features and is ordered by t-value. High absolute t-values indicate a difference in class means of the two (assumed normal distributed) class distributions.

          Figure 7

          Histograms of the yeast protein expression-level project. Histograms are shown for the two amino acid composition features with largest positive and negative t-values (Figure 6), alanine and serine respectively, showing different means of the class distributions.

          Figure 8

          Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve showing performance of a classifier trained for the yeast expression-level project. The ROC curve shows the performance of a linear support vector machine classifier that was trained using the codon composition as features. Results for the 10 cross-validations are shown in gray, the average performance is shown in blue.

          For further exploration of the system, two additional example projects can be initiated. One entails protein subcellular localization in human, a data set of 2580 proteins categorized into 14 different subcellular locations as taken from [35]. The other is a solubility data set obtained from [36], consisting of 17.408 yeast proteins that are split into two equal sized classes: soluble and insoluble.


          SPiCE provides easy access to visualization and classification methods for a set of labeled protein sequences. After uploading a FASTA file with protein sequences and a label file with protein labels, the website can be used to calculate sequence-based features, to visualize the resulting feature matrix, and to train and test classifiers for predicting class labels, enabling quick exploration of sets of labeled proteins. The back-end software is made available for expert users to perform customized and computationally demanding tasks on a local computer.

          Availability and requirements



          This work was supported by the BioRange programme of the Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre (NBIC) and was part of the Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation, both subsidiaries of the Netherlands Genomics Initiative (NGI).

          Authors’ Affiliations

          Delft Bioinformatics Lab, Department of Intelligent Systems, Faculty Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology
          DSM Biotechnology Center
          Netherlands Bioinformatics Centre
          Kluyver Centre for Genomics of Industrial Fermentation


          1. Nancy YY, Wagner JR, Laird MR, Melli G, Rey S, Lo R, Dao P, Sahinalp SC, Ester M, Foster LJ, Brinkman FSL: PSORTb 3.0: improved protein subcellular localization prediction with refined localization subcategories and predictive capabilities for all prokaryotes . Bioinformatics 2010,26(13):1608–1615.View Article
          2. Jensen LJ, Gupta R, Blom N, Devos D, Tamames J, Kesmir C, Nielsen H, Stærfeldt HH, Rapacki K, Workman C, Andersen CAF, Knudsen S, Krogh A, Valencia A, Brunak S: Prediction of human protein function from post translational modifications and localization features . J Mol Biol 2002,319(5):1257–1265.PubMedView Article
          3. Hirose S, Noguchi T: ESPRESSO: a system for estimating protein expression and solubility in protein expression systems . Proteomics 2013,13(9):1444–1456.PubMedView Article
          4. Emanuelsson O, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H: Locating proteins in the cell using targetp, signalp and related tools . Nat Protoc 2007,2(4):953–971.PubMedView Article
          5. EBI Bioinformatics Services [http://​www.​ebi.​ac.​uk/​services]
          6. CBS Prediction Servers [http://​www.​cbs.​dtu.​dk/​services]
          7. PredictProtein [http://​ppopen.​informatik.​tu-muenchen.​de]
          8. Cao DS, Xu QS, Liang YZ: propy: a tool to generate various modes of chou’s PseAAC . Bioinformatics 2013,29(7):960–962.PubMedView Article
          9. Gasteiger E, Hoogland C, Gattiker A, Wilkins MR, Appel RD, Bairoch A: Protein identification and analysis tools on the ExPASy server . In The Proteomics Protocols Handbook. New York: Humana Press; 2005:571–607.View Article
          10. Shen HB, Chou KC: PseAAC: a flexible web server for generating various kinds of protein pseudo amino acid composition . Anal Biochem 2008,373(2):386–388.PubMedView Article
          11. Li ZR, Lin HH, Han LY, Jiang L, Chen X, Chen YZ: PROFEAT: a web server for computing structural and physicochemical features of proteins and peptides from amino acid sequence . Nucleic Acids Res 2006,34(suppl 2):32–37.View Article
          12. Rao HB, Zhu F, Yang GB, Li ZR, Chen YZ: Update of PROFEAT: a web server for computing structural and physicochemical features of proteins and peptides from amino acid sequence . Nucleic Acids Res 2011,39(suppl 2):385–390.View Article
          13. Sonnenburg S, Rätsch G, Henschel S, Widmer C, Behr J, Zien A, Bona Fd, Binder A, Gehl C, Franc V: The SHOGUN machine learning toolbox . J Mach Learn Res 2010, 99:1799–1802.
          14. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, Vanderplas J, Passos A, Cournapeau D, Brucher M, Perrot M, Duchesnay E: Scikit-learn: machine learning in python . J Mach Learn Res 2011, 12:2825–2830.
          15. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH: The WEKA data mining software: an update . ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 2009,11(1):10–18.View Article
          16. Wessels LFA, Reinders MJT, Hart AAM, Veenman CJ, Dai H, He YD, van’t Veer LJ: A protocol for building and evaluating predictors of disease state based on microarray data . Bioinformatics 2005,21(19):3755–6372.PubMedView Article
          17. Jain AK, Duin RPW, Mao J: Statistical pattern recognition: a review . IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 2000,22(1):4–37.View Article
          18. de Ridder D, de Ridder J, Reinders MJT: Pattern recognition in bioinformatics . Brief Bioinform 2013,14(5):633–647.PubMedView Article
          19. Duda RO, Hart PE, Stork RG: Pattern Classification. Hoboken: Wiley-Interscience; 2000.
          20. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J: The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction. Berlin: Springer; 2009.View Article
          21. Kawashima S, Pokarowski P, Pokarowska M, Kolinski A, Katayama T, Kanehisa M: AAindex: amino acid index database, progress report . Nucleic Acids Res 2008,36(suppl 1):202–205.
          22. Georgiev AG: Interpretable numerical descriptors of amino acid space . J Comput Biol 2009,16(5):703–723.PubMedView Article
          23. van den Berg BA, Nijkamp JF, Reinders MJT, Wu L, Pel HJ, Roubos JA, de Ridder D: Sequence-based prediction of protein secretion success in Aspergillus niger . In Proceedings of Pattern Recegnition in Bioinformatics 2010. Berlin: Springer; 2010:3–14.View Article
          24. Moreau G, Broto P: Autocorrelation of molecular structures, application to SAR studies . New J Chem 1980,4(12):757–764.
          25. Moran PAP: Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena . Biometrika 1950,37(1/2):17–23.PubMedView Article
          26. Geary RC: The contiguity ratio and statistical mapping . Incorporated Statistician 1954,5(3):115–146.View Article
          27. Chou KC: Prediction of protein cellular attributes using pseudo-amino acid composition . Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf 2001,43(3):246–255.View Article
          28. Chou KC: Using amphiphilic pseudo amino acid composition to predict enzyme subfamily classes . Bioinformatics 2005,21(1):10–19.PubMedView Article
          29. Dubchak I, Muchnik I, Holbrook SR, Kim SH: Prediction of protein folding class using global description of amino acid sequence . Proc Natl Acad Sci 1995,92(19):8700–8704.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
          30. Chou KC: Prediction of protein subcellular locations by incorporating quasi-sequence-order effect . Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2000,278(2):477–483.PubMedView Article
          31. Schneider G, Wrede P: The rational design of amino acid sequences by artificial neural networks and simulated molecular evolution: de novo design of an idealized leader peptidase cleavage site . Biophys J 1994,66(2):335–344.PubMed CentralPubMedView Article
          32. van den Berg BA, Reinders MJT, Hulsman M, Wu L, Pel HJ, Roubos JA, de Ridder D: Exploring sequence characteristics related to high-level production of secreted proteins in Aspergillus niger . PLoS ONE 2012,7(10):45869.View Article
          33. Ghaemmaghami S, Huh WK, Bower K, Howson RW, Belle A, Dephoure N, O’Shea EK, Weissman JS: Global analysis of protein expression in yeast . Nature 2003,425(6959):737–741.PubMedView Article
          34. Dondoshansky I: Blastclust (NCBI Software Development Toolkit) . Bethesda: NCBI; 2002.
          35. Shen HB, Chou KC: A top-down approach to enhance the power of predicting human protein subcellular localization: Hum-mPLoc 2.0 . Anal Biochem 2009,394(2):269–274.PubMedView Article
          36. Magnan CN, Randall A, Baldi P: SOLpro: accurate sequence-based prediction of protein solubility . Bioinformatics 2009,25(17):2200–2207.PubMedView Article


          © van den Berg et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

          This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License(http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.