Skip to main content

Table 6 Runtime Comparisons

From: BFL: a node and edge betweenness based fast layout algorithm for large scale networks

 

Runtime Comparisons Between Algorithms

  

Dataset Number of Node/Edge

Random Graph

2000/7000

Random Graph

4000/12000

UO Analysis

1897/2849

Dense Graph

2000/11000

Dense Graph

2000/47000

Betweenness

.4s

1.4s

.8s

.05s

3.7s

Kamada-Kawai (Pajek)

17.9s

40.3s

22.2s

14.16s

32.64s

Fruchterman Reingold (Pajek)

30s

34s

31s

33.20s

42.06s

GEM (Tulip)

485s

1800s+

665s

394.95s

475s

RSFDP (InterViewer)

1.8s

2.1s

2.1 s

31.22s

40.46s

  1. Runtime of the proposed method is compared to those fo existing methods (Kamada-Kawai, Fruchterman Reingold, GEM, and RSDFP) for several graphs. Dense Graph 2000/11000 and Dense Graph 2000/47000 were generated by adding 4000 and 40000 edges respectively to 10% nodes in Random Graph 2000/7000.