Skip to main content

Table 4 Individual ability of various datatypes to predict MIPS complexes.

From: Triangle network motifs predict complexes by complementing high-error interactomes with structural information

Network

Number of nodes a

Number of edges b

Node overlap with MIPS c

MIPS nodes not in network d

Network nodes not in MIPS e

Nodes in edge overlap f

Edges in edge overlap g

MIPS nodes not in edge overlap h

MIPS edges not in network i

Network edges not in MIPS j

Gavin06MATRIX

2551

93881

584

791

1967

554

305

821

247

3989

Gavin06SPOKE

2551

22452

584

791

1967

535

232

840

320

950

Krogan06

3670

14291

1031

344

2639

994

359

381

928

2225

SDDI k

1551

42222

515

860

1036

500

182

875

207

7375

Threading

4019

95935

1037

338

2982

1017

219

358

1129

11938

Literature co-occurrence l

96379

170638

1056

319

95323

1235

491

140

1299

2129

Domain co-occurrence m

3560

158704

1042

333

2518

1038

287

337

940

6064

All above combined

100443

504242

1351

24

99092

1358

979

17

1048

24156

  1. Symbols below denote N, nodes; E, edges; |·|, set cardinality; ∩, intersection; -, set difference; ×, cross product
  2. a |N network |
  3. b |E network |
  4. c |N MIPS ∩ N network |
  5. d |N MIPS - N network |
  6. e |N network - N MIPS |
  7. f |Nodes in E MIPS ∩ E network |
  8. g |E MIPS ∩ E network |
  9. h |N MIPS - Nodes in E MIPS ∩ E network |
  10. i |(E MIPS ∩ (N network × N network )) - E network |
  11. j |(E network ∩ (N MIPS × N MIPS )) - E MIPS |
  12. k Structural domain-domain interactions
  13. l PubMed literature co-occurrences of protein mentions
  14. m Pfam domain co-occurrences in IntAct PPIs
  15. This table shows the MIPS overlaps with other network datasets (shown in the first column), indicating the ability of the various networks to predict MIPS. The MIPS network has number of protein nodes |N MIPS | = 1375 and number of edges |E MIPS | = 2099.