Skip to main content

Table 2 Compared enrichment variations over 5 methods

From: Ligand scaffold hopping combining 3D maximal substructure search and molecular similarity

 

CDK2

FXa

NA

RNAse

TK

Enrichment 1%

     

CSR

11–56

0–63

33–100

100-100

22–78

SM

22–67

0–63

44–67

43–100

22–78

RC

11–56

0–38

67–100

29–57

44–100

2D

0–33

0–38

22–89

100-100

22–89

Enrichment 3%

     

CSR

33–56

0–63

56–100

100-100

33–89

SM

22–67

0–75

56–100

43–100

56–100

RC

22–67

0–63

78–100

29–86

56–100

2D

11–56

0–38

22–89

100-100

44–100

  1. For 5 families of active compounds, we present for LigCSRre (CSR), MED-SuMoLig (SM), ROCS-cff (RC) and ChemMine (2D), the minimal and maximal enrichment scores at 1% and 3%. Results expressed in % of recovered co-active ligands.