Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing S2A2 matrix with other methods for fold recognition on the Lindahl benchmark

From: (PS)2-v2: template-based protein structure prediction server

Methods Family (%) Superfamily (%) Fold (%)
  Top 1 Top 5 Top 1 Top 5 Top 1 Top 5
S2A2 a 77.1 85.1 43.8 63.1 26.5 50.8
S2A2+PSSM a 82.2 88.8 56.7 75.6 27.1 54.5
PSI-BLAST 74.4 79.5 38.5 49.1 4.4 14.6
prof_sim 80.7 86.5 50.9 61.3 22.1 39.6
RAPTORb 84.8 87.1 47.0 60.0 31.3 54.2
PROSPECT IIc 84.1 88.2 52.6 64.8 27.7 50.3
SPARKSd 81.6 88.1 52.5 69.1 24.3 47.7
FOLDproe 85.0 89.9 55.5 70.0 26.5 48.3
SP3 f 81.6 86.8 55.3 67.7 28.7 47.4
SP4 f 80.9 86.3 57.8 68.9 30.8 53.6
  1. aThis work.
  2. b, c, d, e, fResults are summarized from previous works [43, 44, 9, 45, 13], respectively.