Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparing S2A2 matrix with other methods for fold recognition on the Lindahl benchmark

From: (PS)2-v2: template-based protein structure prediction server

Methods

Family (%)

Superfamily (%)

Fold (%)

 

Top 1

Top 5

Top 1

Top 5

Top 1

Top 5

S2A2 a

77.1

85.1

43.8

63.1

26.5

50.8

S2A2+PSSM a

82.2

88.8

56.7

75.6

27.1

54.5

PSI-BLAST

74.4

79.5

38.5

49.1

4.4

14.6

prof_sim

80.7

86.5

50.9

61.3

22.1

39.6

RAPTORb

84.8

87.1

47.0

60.0

31.3

54.2

PROSPECT IIc

84.1

88.2

52.6

64.8

27.7

50.3

SPARKSd

81.6

88.1

52.5

69.1

24.3

47.7

FOLDproe

85.0

89.9

55.5

70.0

26.5

48.3

SP3 f

81.6

86.8

55.3

67.7

28.7

47.4

SP4 f

80.9

86.3

57.8

68.9

30.8

53.6

  1. aThis work.
  2. b, c, d, e, fResults are summarized from previous works [43, 44, 9, 45, 13], respectively.