Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of AdaFuzzy to other methods using over-representation analysis and gene set enrichment analysis.

From: Uncovering transcriptional interactions via an adaptive fuzzy logic approach

TF

# TIs

Over-representation analysis

Gene set enrichment analysis

  

AdaFuzzy*

cPSMF

GRAM

COGRIM

ReMoDis

AdaFuzzy*

cPSMF

GRAM

COGRIM

ReMoDis

ABF1

598

5.48

5.93

6.12

5.74

4.55

4.57

4.56

4.60

5.05

3.76

ACE2

125

4.32

4.43

1.60

3.59

4.47

3.47

2.06

5.23

3.43

1.53

FKH1

164

4.53

4.62

4.79

1.76

4.05

4.26

4.51

1.91

2.99

2.04

FKH2

227

6.53

6.10

1.28

5.82

6.09

3.96

2.86

3.60

4.02

2.41

GCN4

306

6.96

7.23

6.64

7.40

7.61

4.36

5.71

2.09

1.48

4.72

LEU3

267

6.95

7.74

7.29

6.44

5.20

2.19

2.70

1.32

1.05

1.83

MBP1

315

6.48

6.08

6.15

4.93

6.17

4.78

4.17

4.21

4.91

3.40

MCM1

378

6.81

6.13

6.87

5.97

6.74

3.36

2.71

1.19

2.93

1.40

NDD1

60

4.33

1.64

1.82

1.66

4.49

3.09

2.67

2.40

3.09

3.47

RAP1

993

9.05

8.39

7.37

8.92

6.60

5.45

6.49

0.85

2.17

2.04

REB1

216

5.30

5.52

5.03

5.53

5.10

5.12

4.13

5.09

4.92

3.46

STB1

143

5.51

4.72

4.43

3.91

6.51

4.92

2.11

0.50

2.89

5.09

SWI4

346

6.73

7.06

5.61

5.76

6.42

4.52

5.22

4.25

4.73

1.56

SWI5

255

5.36

4.41

2.36

5.70

4.78

5.51

6.01

5.79

5.54

0.94

SWI6

237

5.93

5.66

4.58

4.79

4.90

3.64

2.81

4.08

4.23

4.23

HSF1

335

5.61

6.53

4.42

4.40

4.38

3.74

3.47

1.64

2.92

3.52

MSN4

310

5.93

6.31

5.51

5.67

5.72

4.01

2.77

0.86

4.58

1.93

SKN7

403

5.78

5.86

6.75

4.55

2.91

2.57

1.29

2.88

1.27

0.85

YAP1

1246

6.46

6.08

5.69

6.64

5.92

3.03

3.10

2.62

2.81

1.90

Averaged

6.00

5.81

4.96

5.22

5.40

4.03

3.65

2.90

3.42

2.64

  1. * The performances of AdaFuzzy are average results of 500 repeated 3-fold CVs.