Skip to main content

Table 10 Results of the experimental comparison between the proposed MODAS method and competing structural class prediction methods on the D498 dataset.

From: Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences

Classifier used (name of the method, if any)

Feature vector

Reference

Accuracy

   

α

β

α/β

α+β

Avg

Component-coupling

AA composition

70

93.5

88.9

90.4

84.5

89.2

Neural network

AA composition

80

86.0

96.0

88.2

86.0

89.2

Rough sets

AA composition and physicochemical properties

49

87.9

91.3

97.1

86.0

90.8

SVM with RBF kernel (SCPRED)

custom

79

94.9

91.7

94.2

86.1

91.5

SVM

AA composition

82

88.8

95.2

96.3

91.5

93.2

Fuzzy k-nearest neighbor algorithm

protein sequence

68

95.3

93.7

97.8

88.3

93.8

Nearest Neighbor (NN-CDM)

protein sequence

69

96.3

93.7

95.6

89.9

93.8

LogitBoost

AA composition

71

92.5

96.0

97.1

93.0

94.8

SVM with RBF kernel (SCEC)

PSI-BLAST based p-collocated AA pairs

75

98.0

93.3

95.6

93.4

94.9

IB1

PSI-BLAST based p-collocated AA pairs

75

95.0

95.8

97.8

94.2

95.7

SVM with polynomial or RBF kernels (MODAS)

custom

this paper

96.7

97.5

95.6

97.1

96.8

  1. The results were obtained using jackknife test. The methods are ordered by their average accuracies. Best results are shown in bold.