Skip to main content

Table 7 Results of the experimental comparison between the proposed MODAS method and competing structural class prediction methods on the 25PDB dataset.

From: Modular prediction of protein structural classes from sequences of twilight-zone identity with predicting sequences

Classifier used (name of the method, if any)

Feature vector (# features)

Reference

Accuracy

MCC

GC2

   

α

β

α/β

α+β

overal l

α

β

α/β

α+β

 

SVM with 1st order polyn. kernel

autocorrelation (30)

73

50.1

49.4

28.8

29.5

34.2

0.16

0.16

0.05

0.05

0.02

Multinomial logistic regression

custom dipeptides (16)

58

56.2

44.5

41.3

18.8

40.2

0.23

0.20

0.31

0.06

0.05

Bagging with random tree

CV (20)

54

58.7

47.0

35.5

24.7

41.8

0.33

0.26

0.22

0.06

0.06

Information discrepancy

tripeptides (8000)

59, 60

45.8

48.5

51.7

32.5

44.7

0.39

0.39

0.25

0.06

0.11

LogicBoost with decision tree

CV (20)

46

56.9

51.5

45.4

30.2

46.0

0.41

0.32

0.32

0.06

0.10

Information discrepancy

dipeptides (400)

59, 60

59.6

54.2

47.1

23.5

47.0

0.46

0.40

0.24

0.04

0.12

LogitBoost with decision stump

CV (20)

54

62.8

52.6

50.0

32.4

49.4

0.49

0.35

0.34

0.11

0.13

SVM with 3rd order polyn. kernel

CV (20)

54

61.2

53.5

57.2

27.7

49.5

0.46

0.35

0.39

0.11

0.13

SVM with Gaussian kernel

CV (20)

47

68.6

59.6

59.8

28.6

53.9

0.52

0.42

0.43

0.15

0.17

Multinomial logistic regression

custom (66)

73

69.1

61.6

60.1

38.3

57.1

0.56

0.44

0.48

0.21

0.21

Nearest neighbor

Composition of tripeptides (8000)

52

60.6

60.7

67.9

44.3

58.6

---

---

---

---

---

SVM with RBF kernel

custom (34)

72

69.7

62.1

67.1

39.3

59.5

0.60

0.50

0.53

0.21

0.25

Multinomial logistic regression

custom (34)

72

71.1

65.3

66.5

37.3

60.0

0.61

0.51

0.51

0.22

0.25

StackingC ensemble

custom (34)

72

74.6

67.9

70.2

32.4

61.3

0.62

0.53

0.55

0.22

0.26

Linear logistic regression

custom (58)

30

75.2

67.5

62.1

44.0

62.2

0.63

0.54

0.54

0.27

0.27

SVM with 1st order polyn. kernel

custom (58)

30

77.4

66.4

61.3

45.4

62.7

0.65

0.54

0.55

0.27

0.28

SVM with RBF kernel

custom (56)

61

76.5

67.3

66.8

45.8

64.0

0.62

0.51

0.50

0.28

---

Discriminant analysis

custom (16)

78

64.3

65.0

61.7

65.0

64.0

---

---

---

---

---

SVM with Gaussian kernel

custom (8 PSI Pred based)

79

92.6

80.6

73.4

68.5

79.1

0.87

0.79

0.67

0.54

0.54

SVM with Gaussian kernel

PSI Pred based (13)

79

92.6

79.8

74.9

69.0

79.3

0.87

0.79

0.68

0.55

0.55

SVM with RBF kernel (SCPRED)

custom (9)

79

92.6

80.1

74.0

71.0

79.7

0.87

0.79

0.69

0.57

0.55

SVM with polynomial or RBF kernels (MODAS)

custom(117, 53, 46, 163)

this paper

92.3

83.7

81.2

68.3

81.4

0.88

0.79

0.76

0.58

0.58

  1. The results were obtained using jackknife test. The methods are ordered by their average accuracies which coincide with the GC2 scores. Best results are shown in bold and "---" indicates results that were not reported by the original authors and which cannot be duplicated.