Skip to main content

Table 2 Classification results

From: Improved analysis of bacterial CGH data beyond the log-ratio paradigm

Array

Flagging

# probes

Method

Sens.

Spec.

PPV

NPV

S. aureus

Weak

4515

BCSP

0.968

0.938

0.987

0.861

   

Mix.mod.

0.945

0.901

0.979

0.776

   

p-value

4.1·10-7

7.4·10-4

1.7·10-4

2.5·10-7

 

Hard

3539

BCSP

0.977

0.864

0.989

0.754

   

Mix.mod.

0.960

0.825

0.985

0.607

   

p-value

3.2·10-8

0.02

0.003

3.7·10-8

E. faecalis

Weak

3228

BCSP

0.989

0.953

0.983

0.560

   

Mix.mod.

0.946

0.890

0.989

0.458

 

Hard

3145

BCSP

0.992

0.0

0.869

0.0

   

Mix.mod.

0.955

0.474

0.990

0.409

  1. Classification of probes into Present/Absent was done after both weak and hard flagging, see text for details, and using both our bias-corrected S-signal prediction method (BCSP) and the gaussian mixture model method. The number of probes indicate the median number of ordinary probes in a data set after flagging. All the results shown (Sens., Spec., PPV and NPV) are averages over the 28 S. aureus or 4 E. faecalis data sets. The p-values listed for the S. aureus results are the outcome of a Wilcoxon signrank test of wether the BCSP-method is a significant improvement of the mixture model method. A smaller p-value indicate a significant improvement. For the E. faecalis results all p-values were large (> 0.10) and they are not listed.