Figure 9From: Towards comprehensive structural motif mining for better fold annotation in the "twilight zone" of sequence dissimilarityComputational performance comparison. We compared the computational performance between APGM and MGM using synthetic data sets. APGM used isomorphism threshold Ï„ = 1.0, 0.8, 0.7, 0.6. Given the patterns' number N and running time t (s), rate = N/t.Back to article page