Skip to main content

Table 7 Comparison with the structure-based approaches by Chea et al. [13] and Youn et al. [10] on their benchmark datasets.

From: Automatic prediction of catalytic residues by modeling residue structural neighborhood

Method

Datasets of competing methods

  

HA superfamily[13]

EF fold[10]

EF superfamily[10]

EF family[10]

Competing methods

R

29.3

51.1

53.9

57.0

 

P

16.5

17.1

16.9

18.5

   

SVM_P 24_1D1-3, 3D1-6

  

Equal P

R

63.4

64.2

67.3

61.7

Equal R

P

30.9

22.1

22.5

20.9

  1. For each dataset we report the recall obtained by our predictor at a precision equal to that of the competing method and the precision at equal recall. Results are obtained without including ligand information.