Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison with GISTIC.

From: Identification of recurrent regions of copy-number variants across multiple individuals

regions found by

overlap?

no. of regions

mean freq

median conf

discordance**

COVER

✓ GISTIC

139

0.10

30

62%

 

✗ GISTIC

190

0.037

37.5

87%

COMPOSITE

✓ GISTIC

162

0.21

20.0

64%

 

✗ GISTIC

198

0.048

72.8

75%

GISTIC

✓ COVER

153

0.15

22.3

56%

 

✗ COVER

189

0.072

8.8

84%

 

✓ COMPOSITE

173

0.15

20.6

61%

 

✗ COMPOSITE

169

0.058

8.8

82%

  1. ✓ - overlap
  2. ✗ - no overlap
  3. ** discordance rates with Kidd's sequencing results.
  4. This table shows a summary of the results obtained from comparing COVER/COMPOSITE to GISTIC.