Skip to main content

Table 3 Ranking of the performances

From: A benchmark for statistical microarray data analysis that preserves actual biological and technical variance

RUN 1
n 2 3 4 6 8 10 Average
Student 7 7 5 5 5   5.8
Window 2 6 7 7 7   5.8
Welch 8 8 6 6 6   6.8
Win Welch 5 5 8 8 8   6.8
Reg t test 1 3 4 4 3   3.0
SAM 6 4 3 3 2   3.6
Limma 4 2 2 2 4   2.8
Shrinkage t 3 1 1 1 1   1.4
RUN 2
N 2 3 4 6 8 10 Average
Student 7 7 6 5 4   5.8
Window 2 6 5 6 5   4.8
Welch 8 8 8 7 7   7.6
Win Welch 3 5 7 8 8   6.2
Reg t test 1 3 2 4 6   3.2
SAM 6 4 4 3 1   3.6
Limma 5 2 3 2 3   3.0
Shrinkage t 4 1 1 1 2   1.8
RUN 3
n 2 3 4 6 8 10 Average
Student 8 8 5     7.0
Window 2 5 6     4.3
Welch 7 7 8     7.3
Win Welch 3 4 7     4.7
Reg t test 1 2 2     1.7
SAM 6 6 4     5.3
Limma 5 3 3     3.7
Shrinkage t 4 1 1     2.0
  1. Ranking of the performances of all the methods tested. Only significant differences (DUNNET'S post hoc comparison p ≥ 0.05) for each method with respect to Shrinkage t are displayed (no significant difference in Run 4). 1st and 2nd ranks are shown in bold.