Skip to main content

Table 3 Ranking of the performances

From: A benchmark for statistical microarray data analysis that preserves actual biological and technical variance

RUN 1

n

2

3

4

6

8

10

Average

Student

7

7

5

5

5

 

5.8

Window

2

6

7

7

7

 

5.8

Welch

8

8

6

6

6

 

6.8

Win Welch

5

5

8

8

8

 

6.8

Reg t test

1

3

4

4

3

 

3.0

SAM

6

4

3

3

2

 

3.6

Limma

4

2

2

2

4

 

2.8

Shrinkage t

3

1

1

1

1

 

1.4

RUN 2

N

2

3

4

6

8

10

Average

Student

7

7

6

5

4

 

5.8

Window

2

6

5

6

5

 

4.8

Welch

8

8

8

7

7

 

7.6

Win Welch

3

5

7

8

8

 

6.2

Reg t test

1

3

2

4

6

 

3.2

SAM

6

4

4

3

1

 

3.6

Limma

5

2

3

2

3

 

3.0

Shrinkage t

4

1

1

1

2

 

1.8

RUN 3

n

2

3

4

6

8

10

Average

Student

8

8

5

   

7.0

Window

2

5

6

   

4.3

Welch

7

7

8

   

7.3

Win Welch

3

4

7

   

4.7

Reg t test

1

2

2

   

1.7

SAM

6

6

4

   

5.3

Limma

5

3

3

   

3.7

Shrinkage t

4

1

1

   

2.0

  1. Ranking of the performances of all the methods tested. Only significant differences (DUNNET'S post hoc comparison p ≥ 0.05) for each method with respect to Shrinkage t are displayed (no significant difference in Run 4). 1st and 2nd ranks are shown in bold.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us