Skip to main content

Table 5 Variability in peptide termini: Results from negative set.

From: Directionality in protein fold prediction

Code

Length

ALR

Maximum GDT_TS

   

SAINT

Reverse SAINT

Rosetta

1aocA

175

-0.2193

24.83

20.72

23.12

1aym1

285

-0.2877

11.54

10.02

12.45

1aym3

238

-0.1526

15.32

11.75

15.55

1ddlA

188

-0.2148

19.24

19.24

22.04

1dwkA

156

-0.1839

34.48

33.62

35.52

1dy5A

124

-0.1685

26.46

25.00

26.25

1e0cA

271

-0.1927

16.97

14.26

20.38

1kf6D

119

-0.1764

41.51

42.45

38.21

1kptA

105

-0.1756

34.84

30.32

32.98

1kyfA

247

-0.2037

20.27

18.80

20.48

1l7lA

121

-0.1779

21.37

20.94

22.65

1mkaA

171

-0.1794

25.64

26.91

25.96

1nekC

129

-0.2053

54.21

49.07

53.97

1p0zA

131

-0.1594

46.01

43.49

60.92

1qqp3

220

-0.3876

21.20

15.06

18.86

1seiA

130

-0.2636

41.47

36.31

41.27

1tt8A

164

-0.1881

25.32

24.52

26.61

1umhA

184

-0.1630

18.37

16.99

16.85

1uz3A

102

-0.1711

49.41

51.47

45.00

1wt9B

123

-0.1723

35.81

30.18

27.25

1y8cA

246

-0.1984

27.67

19.52

24.38

2ag4A

164

-0.2084

20.09

20.41

21.04

2awgA

118

-0.1693

31.65

25.46

33.26

2b0aA

186

-0.1747

23.33

20.15

21.97

2bnqD

203

-0.1799

26.24

20.44

22.93

2e56A

144

-0.1542

22.01

19.40

20.34

2edmA

161

-0.1638

18.28

18.28

18.10

2nwfA

141

-0.1601

35.04

29.56

34.31

2ov0A

105

-0.2059

29.17

31.25

30.95

2owpA

129

-0.1827

36.67

37.29

35.42

2p25A

126

-0.1604

48.08

46.37

58.12

2tgiA

112

-0.2279

26.21

28.88

29.61

3besR

250

-0.1606

17.58

16.36

16.77

3ezmA

101

-0.3241

37.37

36.86

35.82

  1. Among the 1000 decoys produced for each protein with ALR ≤ -0.15 by each of SAINT, reverse SAINT, and Rosetta the best model (with highest GDT_TS) was found (as indicated in Table 2 by Maximum GDT_TS). Each of these selected models was then altered by chopping off the first N-terminus and last C-terminus secondary structure elements identified in its native structure. GDT_TS scores were then recalculated for each algorithm and are displayed below. The highest GDT_TS is shown in bold while the lowest is shown in italics.