PoGO: Prediction of Gene Ontology terms for fungal proteins

BMC Bioinformatics

Table 3 Performance comparison of GO annotation methods using 71 randomly selected proteins.

	Sensitivity	Specificity	F-measure	Percentage of proteins annotated
PoGO	0.3129	0.4101	0.3948	93.0
InterPro2GO	0.0971	0.0938	0.0938	15.5
AAPFC	0.2623	0.3431	0.2217	91.5
Gotcha	0.1182	0.1980	0.1072	100
MultiPfam2GO	0.0945	0.6425	0.1127	64.8
GOPet	0.2080	0.2752	0.1983	100

The evaluation was performed using 71 (1% of the original training dataset) randomly selected proteins that were held out of the training dataset. All GO terms annotated to the evaluation proteins were considered when computing the performance metrics.

ISSN: 1471-2105