Skip to main content

Table 1 Performance comparison by samples selection by ΔASA

From: Sequence-based identification of interface residues by an integrative profile combining hydrophobic and evolutionary information

SVM Sen Spec Acc MCC Prec F1 ΔΔASA
1 24.18 98.31 77.85 0.3728 84.51 37.6  
2 24.11 98.28 77.81 0.3712 84.27 37.5  
3 23.87 98.19 77.67 0.3656 83.41 37.12 66.9Å2
4 24.62 98.48 78.09 0.3828 86.04 38 28  
5 23.91 98.21 77.7 0.3666 83.57 37.18  
6 20.75 97 75.95 0.2944 72.51 32.26  
7 20.53 96.92 75.83 0.2892 71.75 31.92  
8 20.49 96.9 75.81 0.2883 71.61 31.87 14.5Å2
9 21.02 97.1 76.1 0.3003 73.44 32.68  
10** 20.42 96.87 75.77 0.2866 71.35 31.75  
1*** 44.58 91.52 78.56 0.4161 66.71 53.45  
2 43.73 93.05 79.44 0.4367 70.59 54  
3 43.03 94.4 80.21 0.4571 74.54 54.56  
4 42.09 95.41 80.69 0.4703 77.77 54.62  
5 39.76 96.91 81.14 0.4842 83.07 53.78  
6 6.84 99.17 73.68 0.1726 75.88 12.55  
7 6.16 99.39 73.66 0.1717 79.52 11.44  
8 5.57 99.53 73.59 0.168 81.93 10.41  
9 4.83 99.71 73.52 0.1646 86.37 9.15  
10 4.28 99.82 73.45 0.1611 90.07 8.17  
  1. *The subtraction between average ΔASA for positive samples and that for negative samples.
  2. **The above ten numbers from 1 to 10 stand for the ten-SVMs.
  3. ***The following ten ones stand for the combined SVMs with thresholds from 1 to 10.