Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of network analysis platforms.

From: Biana: a software framework for compiling biological interactions and analyzing networks

Feature

CY

GM

VA

OS

CD

AR

IN

GG

PI

PR

BL

PA

BI

Free for academic use

X

X

X

X

X

   

X

X

X

X

X

Free for commercial use

X

X

X

 

X

   

X

X

X

 

X

Open source

X

X

      

X

X

X

 

X

Curated pathway/network content

 

X

 

X

 

X

X

X

     

Standard file format support

X

 

X

 

X

   

X

X

 

X

X

User-defined networks/pathways

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Functionality to infer new pathways

X

 

X

  

X

 

X

X

   

X

GO/pathway enrichment analysis

X

X

X

   

X

X

    

X

Automated graph layout

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

Complex criteria for visual properties

 

X

   

X

X

X

 

X

X

X

 

Multiple visual styles

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

  

X

  

X

Advanced node selection

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

Customizable gene/protein database

 

X

X

  

X

 

X

X

   

X

Rich graphical annotation

 

X

X

   

X

X

   

X

X

Statistical network analysis

X

 

X

   

X

X

X

 

X

 

X

Extensible functionality: plugins or API

X

 

X

 

X

X

X

X

X

   

X

Quantitative pathway simulation

    

X

X

       
  1. BIANA has been compared with the same programs and using the same set of features as the ones presented in [21]. Compared software: CY, Cytoscape [55]; GM, GenMAPP [58]; VA, VisANT [59]; OS, Osprey [60]; CD, CellDesigner [61]; AR, Ariadne Genomics Pathway Studio [62]; IN, Ingenuity Pathways Analysis http://www.ingenuity.com; GG, GeneGO http://www.genego.com; PI, PIANA [13]; PR, ProViz [63]; BL, BioLayout [64]; PA, PATIKA [65]; BI, BIANA.