Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance assessment of Structural Alphabets in terms of the local and global fit quality.

From: Structural alphabets derived from attractors in conformational space

 

local fit

global fit

 

alphabet

/Ã…

IQD/Ã…

/Ã…

IQD/Ã…

AIC/kbit

M12K31

0.238

0.108

0.885

0.214

-604

M16K28

0.225

0.077

0.770

0.213

-640

M20K27

0.216

0.060

0.733

0.138

-654

M24K23

0.227

0.066

0.783

0.144

-638

M28K21

0.233

0.064

0.823

0.132

-624

M32K25

0.214

0.059

0.700

0.114

-668

M36K20

0.240

0.062

0.855

0.125

-615

M40K20

0.244

0.065

0.867

0.138

-611

M44K17

0.257

0.072

0.955

0.147

-585

M48K17

0.255

0.071

0.918

0.156

-590

M52K21

0.242

0.072

0.772

0.168

-609

M56K17

0.253

0.070

0.909

0.170

-589

M60K16

0.259

0.072

0.952

0.146

-584

CGT2004

0.218

0.062

0.666

0.150

-666

MSM2000

0.286

0.124

0.946

0.414

-604

MxK25GA

0.209

0.056

0.683

0.118

-676

  1. : median cRMSD, IQD: inter-quartile distance of cRMSD; AIC: Akaike Information Criterion. Alphabets are labelled with their MinPts parameter value (M) and alphabet size (K). The literature alphabets CGT2004 and MSM2000 are of size 27 and 28, respectively. Best performing alphabets are highlighted in bold font.