Table 1 Summary of the main approaches to biomedical anaphora resolution
From: Resolving anaphoras for the extraction of drug-drug interactions in pharmacological documents
Authors | Approach | Corpus | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
Castano et al. [13] | Scoring method | 46 medline abstract | F=0.74 |
Lin et al. [14] | Scoring method | 32 MedLine abstract (MedStract) | F=0.92 pronominal, F=0.78 nominal |
Kim et al. [18] | Centering theory for pronominal anaphors and scoring method for nominal anaphors | 120 biological interactions | F=0.64 pronominal, F=0.59 nominal |
Liang and Lin [17] | Scoring method | MedStract + 100 Med- Line abstract | F=0.87 pronominal, F=0.80 nominal |
Segura-Bedmar et al., [26] | Scoring method and a set of semantic and morphological restrictions | 49 MedLine abstracts | F=0.85 pronominal, F=0.50 nominal |
Nguyen and Kim [23] | Maximum Entropy ranker model | Genia | Success rate: 79.55% |