Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison among different folding rate prediction methods based on “IVANKOVDATA”

From: SeqRate: sequence-based protein folding type classification and rates prediction

Methods

Method Type

Fold kinetic Classification Accuracy

Correlation

MAD

Effective length method

sequence

NA

0.70

0.96

LRCO method

sequence

NA

0.61

0.81

FOLD-RATE

sequence

NA

0.91

1.1

K-Fold

structure

81%

0.74

0.75

Multi-predictor SVM (two-state)

sequence

80%

0.81

0.79

Multi-predictor SVM (multi-state)

sequence

80%

0.80

0.68

  1. Method 1: Effective length method [14]
  2. Method 2: LRCO method [19]
  3. Method 3: FOLD-RATE [16]
  4. Method 4: K-Fold [7]
  5. Method 5: Our multi-predictor SVM (two-state)
  6. Method 6: Our multi-predictor SVM (multi-state)
  7. Method-Type means if the method is using experimental structural data (structure) or using only sequence data (sequence). Correlation here means the correlation value between predicted rates and experimental rates. MAD is mean absolute difference between predicted rates and experimental rates.