Table 9 A comparison of the work done by [3] and [4] against the InChI-NGN for the FXa dataset. Missing values are due to lacking information in the primary literature.
Design | Method | Q(%) | SE(%) | SP(%) | MCC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-MIF | 88 | - | - | - |
| Â | MIF-MIF | 84 | - | - | - |
| Â | MK1 | 94.5 | 98.7 | 89.5 | - |
| Â | MK2 | 95.2 | 98.9 | 87.7 | - |
| Â | InChI-NGN | 83.8 | 84.3 | 82.9 | 0.657 |
Leave-20%-Out | InChI-NGN | 86.4±2.50 | 88.5±0.87 | 82.7±0.05 | 0.705±0.052 |
Train, 
Test