Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the proposed and the competing methods on the BT426 dataset

From: Improving the performance of β-turn prediction using predicted shape strings and a two-layer support vector machine model

Predictor

Q total

MCC

Q observed

Q predicted

This paper

87.2

0.66

75.9

73.8

Zheng and Kurgan [27]

80.9

0.47

55.6

62.7

Hu and Li [24]

79.8

0.47

68.9

55.6

DEBT [26]

79.2

0.48

70.1

54.8

BTSVM [21]

78.7

0.45

62.0

56.0

MOLEBRNN [18]

77.9

0.45

66.0

53.9

Zhang et al. [20]

77.3

0.45

67.0

53.1

BETAPRED2 [17]

75.5

0.43

72.3

49.8

Kim [19]

75.0

0.40

66.7

46.5

COUDES [11]

74.8

0.42

69.9

46.5

BTPRED [30]

74.4

0.35

57.3

48.3

  1. Note: Results of other β-turn prediction methods are obtained from the paper which proposed DEBT method.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us