Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of the proposed and the competing methods on the BT426 dataset

From: Improving the performance of β-turn prediction using predicted shape strings and a two-layer support vector machine model

Predictor Q total MCC Q observed Q predicted
This paper 87.2 0.66 75.9 73.8
Zheng and Kurgan [27] 80.9 0.47 55.6 62.7
Hu and Li [24] 79.8 0.47 68.9 55.6
DEBT [26] 79.2 0.48 70.1 54.8
BTSVM [21] 78.7 0.45 62.0 56.0
MOLEBRNN [18] 77.9 0.45 66.0 53.9
Zhang et al. [20] 77.3 0.45 67.0 53.1
BETAPRED2 [17] 75.5 0.43 72.3 49.8
Kim [19] 75.0 0.40 66.7 46.5
COUDES [11] 74.8 0.42 69.9 46.5
BTPRED [30] 74.4 0.35 57.3 48.3
  1. Note: Results of other β-turn prediction methods are obtained from the paper which proposed DEBT method.