Method
|
Wheat with increased variance
|
---|
|
Pred
|
Conf
|
FP
|
FN
|
Sens
|
Spec
|
CAMBa
|
113
|
28
|
36
|
30
|
71.96
|
99.21
|
Outlier
|
113
|
20
|
58
|
52
|
51.40
|
98.73
|
CRISP
|
86
|
25
|
17
|
38
|
64.49
|
99.63
|
VarScan
| | | | | | |
ComSeq
|
743
|
30
|
661
|
25
|
76.64
|
85.51
|
Poisson
|
60
|
18
|
11
|
58
|
45.79
|
99.76
|
- Performance comparison of CAMBa to other methods using default parameters, on the Wheat data set after artificially increasing the coverage variance. The column abbreviations are as in Table 1. All methods are evaluated on their ability to predict the carrier of each candidate mutation, except CRISP, which cannot make such predictions. We were unable to report results for VarScan due to technical issues in generating a modified pileup of reads.