Table 2 Accuracies for the EBD and FI discretization methods
From: Application of an efficient Bayesian discretization method to biomedical data
Classifier | C4.5 | NB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dataset | EBD (SEM) | FI (SEM) | EBD (SEM) | FI (SEM) |
1 | 100.00% (0.00) | 100.00% (0.00) | 93.33% (0.93) | 93.33% (0.85) |
2 | 86.43% (0.79) | 84.62% (0.77) | 93.03% (1.06) | 92.12% (0.94) |
3 | 78.61% (1.30) | 64.23% (1.72) | 81.53% (1.11) | 81.53% (1.02) |
4 | 88.62% (0.66) | 84.38% (0.67) | 75.43% (0.83) | 72.76% (0.79) |
5 | 59.04% (1.72) | 56.33% (1.93) | 71.19% (0.92) | 69.78% (1.13) |
6 | 96.67% (1.10) | 95.67% (0.82) | 82.32% (1.17) | 80.28% (1.51) |
7 | 94.46% (1.03) | 94.46% (1.03) | 97.32% (0.84) | 97.32% (0.84) |
8 | 60.00% (2.08) | 50.00% (2.03) | 72.33% (1.42) | 70.82% (1.49) |
9 | 83.61% (1.28) | 81.29% (0.97) | 91.94% (0.91) | 93.67% (0.72) |
10 | 68.00% (1.98) | 66.54% (1.21) | 76.00% (1.65) | 71.76% (1.32) |
11 | 77.67% (1.30) | 72.44% (0.91) | 75.53% (1.33) | 73.81% (1.11) |
12 | 55.83% (2.14) | 59.58% (2.12) | 63.33% (1.81) | 61.67% (1.84) |
13 | 58.92% (0.86) | 57.14% (0.96) | 50.36% (0.84) | 49.32% (0.88) |
14 | 58.75% (0.91) | 62.33% (1.01) | 58.33% (1.04) | 57.65% (1.09) |
15 | 54.94% (0.72) | 54.20% (0.74) | 55.34% (1.70) | 53.86% (1.07) |
16 | 72.43% (1.32) | 71.25% (1.45) | 86.22% (1.41) | 85.45% (1.22) |
17 | 70.06% (0.94) | 68.96% (1.17) | 82.81% (0.79) | 81.78% (1.42) |
18 | 81.21% (0.58) | 83.78% (0.68) | 83.76% (0.91) | 89.76% (0.75) |
19 | 74.12% (1.32) | 72.22% (1.21) | 85.12% (1.09) | 84.19% (1.31) |
20 | 59.45% (2.08) | 59.45% (2.08) | 100.00% (0.00) | 100.00% (0.00) |
21 | 62.32% (1.54) | 65.24% (1.43) | 78.23% (0.59) | 76.23% (0.54) |
22 | 73.22% (0.78) | 69.78% (1.21) | 78.23% (0.77) | 77.23% (0.78) |
23 | 73.32% (0.92) | 68.49% (0.98) | 46.22% (0.98) | 48.55% (0.87) |
24 | 76.12% (1.32) | 73.04% (1.72) | 83.32% (1.65) | 80.12% (1.23) |
Average | 73.49% (2.07) | 71.48% (2.12) | 77.55% (2.65) | 76.79% (2.32) |