Skip to main content

Table 1 Power calculation under Scenario (A)

From: Multilocus association mapping using generalized ridge logistic regression

Strategy

Corr

MAF

Method

   

LR

FPM

TPM

Lasso

Enet

GRLR

I

0.0

0.10

0.196

0.206

0.198

0.210

0.226

0.196

  

0.30

0.638

0.620

0.602

0.688

0.670

0.650

  

0.50

0.792

0.734

0.730

0.790

0.828

0.826

 

0.2

0.10

0.184

0.216

0.194

0.194

0.204

0.206

  

0.30

0.712

0.642

0.622

0.690

0.726

0.704

  

0.50

0.860

0.794

0.788

0.902

0.888

0.870

II

0.0

0.10

0.008

0.078

0.070

0.032

0.052

0.124

  

0.30

0.122

0.266

0.252

0.340

0.392

0.558

  

0.50

0.354

0.304

0.306

0.526

0.624

0.768

 

0.2

0.10

0.018

0.088

0.064

0.066

0.078

0.126

  

0.30

0.202

0.296

0.300

0.364

0.458

0.608

  

0.50

0.400

0.370

0.360

0.628

0.690

0.806

  1. Results of power simulations for six methods under Scenario (A) (two causal SNPs). Two definitions of testing success, Strategy I (requiring that at least one of the two SNPs is significant) and Strategy II (requiring significance at both SNPs), are applied in comparisons; The number of replication runs is 500 for all the simulations. Corr = correlation coefficient; MAF = minor allele frequency.