Skip to main content

Table 2 EM, FBG-sampling, and approximate sampling results for simulated, HBL-2, and Corriel dataset are shown here

From: Fast MCMC sampling for hidden markov models to determine copy number variations

Dataset Method w F1-measure Recall Precision Time Compression Speed-up Likelihood
   0.50 0.97 ± 0.04 0.96 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.02 27 0.387 2.2  
   0.75 0.97 ± 0.04 0.96 ± 0.06 0.98 ± 0.03 16 0.195 3.7  
   1.00 0.97 ± 0.05 0.95 ± 0.07 0.98 ± 0.03 10 0.097 5.9  
  Approx 1.25 0.96 ± 0.06 0.94 ± 0.09 0.98 ± 0.03 7 0.050 8.8  
Simulated   1.50 0.94 ± 0.09 0.92 ± 0.12 0.97 ± 0.07 5 0.031 11.3  
   1.75 0.91 ± 0.15 0.89 ± 0.18 0.96 ± 0.12 5 0.023 12.2  
   2.00 0.86 ± 0.19 0.85 ± 0.21 0.92 ± 0.19 5 0.018 12.2  
  FBG ... 0.97 ± 0.04 0.96 ± 0.05 0.98 ± 0.03 58 ... 1.0  
  EM prior, ML ... 0.96 ± 0.09 0.97 ± 0.04 0.96 ± 0.11 58 ... ...  
   1.0 0.85 ± 0.00 0.83 ± 0.00 0.88 ± 0.00 72 0.078 11.3  
   2.0 0.87 ± 0.00 0.83 ± 0.00 0.91 ± 0.00 21 0.018 39.3  
   3.0 0.89 ± 0.00 0.83 ± 0.00 0.95 ± 0.00 13 0.006 61.8  
  Approx 4.0 0.84 ± 0.08 0.77 ± 0.11 0.95 ± 0.01 13 0.003 61.9  
   5.0 0.71 ± 0.17 0.60 ± 0.22 0.95 ± 0.01 13 0.002 64.8  
   6.0 0.79 ± 0.07 0.69 ± 0.10 0.96 ± 0.01 14 0.002 59.3  
   7.0 0.76 ± 0.08 0.64 ± 0.11 0.93 ± 0.01 13 0.001 61.4  
HBL-2 FBG ... 0.82 ± 0.00 0.84 ± 0.00 0.80 ± 0.00 810 ... 1.0  
  EM prior, ML ... 0.65 0.90 0.50 810 ... ... 15158
  EM prior, best ... 0.85 0.84 0.86 810 ... ... 9616
  EM prior, mean ... 0.76 ± 0.09 0.86 ± 0.03 0.68 ± 0.12 810 ... ... 13744
  EM unif, ML ... 0.64 0.90 0.50 810 ... ... 15159
  EM unif, best ... 0.86 0.84 0.88 810 ... ... 9136
  EM unif, mean ... 0.54 ± 0.24 0.77 ± 0.21 0.46 ± 0.27 810 ... ... 13457
GM05296 Approx 2.0 0.96 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 0.93 ± 0.01 3 0.027 13.0  
  FBG ... 0.89 ± 0.01 1.00 ± 0.00 0.81 ± 0.01 40 ... 1.0  
GM00143 Approx 2.0 0.98 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.00 0.96 ± 0.00 3 0.027 13.8  
  FBG ... 0.89 ± 0.24 1.00 ± 0.00 0.86 ± 0.26 40 ... 1.0  
  1. Approximate sampling results are reported for different choices of w. The w value which is closest to the one estimated by the L-method is shown in italic. Width w is reported in σ D of the corresponding dataset, time is reported in seconds, and compression is defined as T T . For HBL-2, the initial parameter values for EM are sampled from the prior or uniform distributions, and the average (mean), most likely (ML), and best (in terms of F1-measure) performances along with likelihoods are reported.