Table 3 Comparison of performances of different methods on heterogeneous models
From: SNPInterForest: A new method for detecting epistatic interactions
| Â | SNPInterForest | BOOST | SNPHarvester | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Â | # of true positives (N total = 100) | # of false positives | # of true positives (N total = 100) | # of false positives | # of true positives (N total = 100) | # of false positives |
h2 = 0.4, MAF = 0.2 | 98 | 1 | 98 | 5 | 64 | 0 |
h2 = 0.4, MAF = 0.4 | 98 | 0 | 100 | 7 | 66 | 1 |
h2 = 0.3, MAF = 0.2 | 90 | 1 | 81 | 6 | 59 | 0 |
h2 = 0.3, MAF = 0.4 | 80 | 0 | 100 | 7 | 62 | 0 |
h2 = 0.2, MAF = 0.2 | 28 | 4 | 16 | 10 | 19 | 0 |
h2 = 0.2, MAF = 0.4 | 38 | 1 | 78 | 3 | 29 | 2 |