BMC Bioinformatics

Table 3 Quince's 454 data

From: Estimation of bacterial diversity using next generation sequencing of 16S rDNA: a comparison of different workflows

	Artificial			Priest Pot
	3%	5%	10%	3%	5%	10%
CROP	41	25	15	562	246	42
ESPRIT	248	77	38	1115	773	394
MAFFT+JC	686	686	686	3764	3764	3764
MAFFT+MAFFT	31933	31933	31933	15984	15984	15984
MAFFT+Mothur	1756	1756	1756	6672	6672	6672
Mothur+JC	49	36	33	640	537	537
Mothur+MAFFT	4276	4276	4276	2824	2824	2824
Mothur+Mothur	113	53	53	766	642	642
Mothur+PreC+ JC	61	40	36	662	482	482
Mothur+PreC+MAFFT	3864	3141	3141	1905	1625	1625
Mothur+PreC+Mothur	136	65	46	810	575	575
MUSCLE+JC	146	146	146	4059	4059	4059
MUSCLE+MAFFT	33491	33491	33491	15718	15718	15718
MUSCLE+Mothur	258	258	258	6433	6433	6433
Otupipe	66	39	24	793	570	302
RDP	250	94	43	1209	862	456

OTUs observed with each of the workflows analysed at distances of 3, 5 and 10% for Quince's Artificial and Priest Pot datasets. For the Priest Pot data, 855 OTUs at 3% and 699 at 5% were previously estimated by Quince et al. [26].

Back to article page

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us

General enquiries: journalsubmissions@springernature.com