Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparative diversity analysis

From: Estimation of bacterial diversity using next generation sequencing of 16S rDNA: a comparison of different workflows

  Control GTZ Glyphosate
  t1 t2 t1 t2 t1 t2
CROP 812 286 414 625 454 477
ESPRIT 1631 1053 1227 922 1951 1102
MAFFT+JC 1936 1087 1025 975 1977 1088
MAFFT+MAFFT 2792 1588 1971 1329 3296 1577
MAFFT+Mothur 2112 1215 1655 1163 2646 1326
Mothur+JC 3464 1622 3842 823 5024 1090
Mothur+MAFFT 2789 1589 1969 1328 3323 1574
Mothur+Mothur 1730 1128 1310 982 2122 1209
Mothur+PreC+JC 2479 1460 1958 826 3134 1498
Mothur+PreC+MAFFT 2471 1459 1961 1252 3135 1495
Mothur+PreC+Mothur 2063 1143 1890 1010 2516 1221
MUSCLE+JC 1762 1247 1257 950 2020 1238
MUSCLE+MAFFT 2790 1587 1970 1330 3296 1577
MUSCLE+Mothur 2278 1352 1800 1059 2772 1477
Otupipe 1314 881 938 795 1428 948
RDP 1762 1106 1236 901 1932 1094
  1. OTUs observed with each of the workflows analysed. For simplicity, only results at 3% dissimilarity are shown from pooled samples collected at two different times from control, GTZ and glyphosate treated soils [32]. Full data at 3, 5 and 10% is provided in the comprehensive OTU results table of the Additional file 1, Tables S1.1, S1.2 and S1.3.