Skip to main content

Table 1 Overall performance measure of classification algorithms on datasets

From: Comparative study of classification algorithms for immunosignaturing data

Algorithms

T1D

Az

Ab

Asthma

A & B

A & C

B & D

Avg.

Rank

Naïve Bayes

92.0

93.4

91.5

77.7

90.8

93.5

93.6

90.4

1

MLP

90.1

92.7

90.2

71.1

84.7

92.7

89.3

87.3

2

SVM

91.6

88.0

90.7

71.3

86.1

88.4

93.1

87.0

3

VFI

90.5

92.2

75.5

62.6

87.7

93.4

92.7

84.9

4

Hyper Pipes

89.8

89.7

81.3

62.3

82.0

86.6

87.8

82.8

5

R. Forest

91.5

82.4

93.3

62.8

80.6

81.4

81.1

81.9

6

Bayes Net

90.3

87.7

92.5

53.9

80.2

83.2

85.1

81.8

7

K-means

88.3

91.8

80.7

59.6

77.8

83.3

83.6

80.7

8

Logistic R.

90.6

93.3

60.4

50.7

81.5

84.8

90.7

78.9

9

SLR

92.2

71.8

90.1

72.2

65.0

68.5

84.7

77.8

10

KNN

91.4

81.5

52.5

55.8

87.5

75.7

89.0

76.2

11

K star

81.9

90.7

89.4

53.5

64.3

68.8

70.7

74.2

12

M5P

85.1

58.7

83.2

60.0

75.2

73.4

79.6

73.6

13

J48

80.3

69.7

78.4

48.7

70.6

68.4

76.7

70.4

14

Random Tree

83.8

71.7

76.2

52.9

69.3

60.8

75.0

70.0

15

ASC

76.8

70.0

77.9

43.1

72.0

63.1

76.7

68.5

16

LDA

69.7

52.0

89.1

70.8

62.8

69.7

52.6

66.7

17

  1. T1D: Type 1 diabetes datasets, Az: Alzehemer’s dataset, Ab: Antibodies dataset. Table showing algorithms overall performance in each datasets based on average score. Score >90% are marked in bold. Naïve Bayes scored the overall highest average score of 90.4%.