Skip to main content

Table 14 Output of the comparison of Mafft against Probcons over Metazoa

From: Surprising results on phylogenetic tree building methods based on molecular sequences

Metazoa: Mafft_CodonDist_BioNJ - Probcons_CodonDist_BioNJ, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_CodonDist_FastME - Probcons_CodonDist_FastME, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_CodonDist_LST - Probcons_CodonDist_LST, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_Gap - Probcons_Gap, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_InducDist_BioNJ - Probcons_InducDist_BioNJ, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_InducDist_FastME - Probcons_InducDist_FastME, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_InducDist_LST - Probcons_InducDist_LST, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_Parsimony - Probcons_Parsimony, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_PhyML - Probcons_PhyML, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_RAxML - Probcons_RAxML, 59613 OGs
Metazoa: Mafft_RAxMLG - Probcons_RAxMLG, 59613 OGs
  Mafft is strongly better than Probcons
  Mafft - Probcons: -0.0390 +- 0.0017, n=655743
  1. Sample output showing the selection of which methods to compare when summarizing results, Table 14. The difference of the Taxon measures is taken over corresponding pairs of trees. These corresponding pairs differ only in the components we want to compare. Furthermore, they will be computed over exactly the same population of OGs.