Skip to main content

Table 2 Prediction results by means of AUC values

From: Evaluating the effect of disturbed ensemble distributions on SCFG based statistical sampling of RNA secondary structures

 

(a) For our tRNA database

Approach

Errors

MEA struct.

Centroid

SCFG

—

0.828522

0.833894

 

mep (0.5)

0.819658

0.823811

 

mep (0.99)

0.786645

0.788478

 

fep (0.5)

0.805999

0.807240

 

fep (0.99)

0.440021

0.422778

LSCFG

—

0.936285

0.919736

 

mep (0.5)

0.932121

0.916321

 

mep (0.99)

0.916540

0.896024

 

fep (0.5)

0.924191

0.908943

 

fep (0.99)

0.752030

0.722737

 

(b) For our 5S rRNA database.

Approach

Errors

MEA struct.

Centroid

SCFG

—

0.409278

0.408549

 

mep (0.5)

0.401914

0.400515

 

mep (0.99)

0.376683

0.375488

 

fep (0.5)

0.400827

0.397566

 

fep (0.99)

0.189628

0.182902

LSCFG

—

0.914801

0.918933

 

mep (0.5)

0.911963

0.915503

 

mep (0.99)

0.902330

0.905126

 

fep (0.5)

0.906507

0.911063

 

fep (0.99)

0.776239

0.777355

  1. All values have been computed by 10-fold cross-validation procedures, using sample size 1000 and min hel = min HL = 1.
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us