Skip to main content

Table 8 10-folds cross-validation predictive accuracies for Aleph, ProGolem and SVM

From: Automated identification of protein-ligand interaction features using Inductive Logic Programming: a hexose binding case study

 

Learning algorithm

Fold

Aleph 1

ProG. 1

Aleph 2

ProG. 2

SVM

1

50.0%

75.0%

56.3%

75.0%

81.3%

2

68.8%

81.3%

68.8%

81.3%

87.5%

3

62.5%

68.8%

68.8%

93.8%

87.5%

4

50.0%

56.3%

68.8%

75.0%

75.0%

5

75.0%

81.3%

56.3%

81.3%

75.0%

6

68.8%

87.5%

81.3%

87.5%

87.5%

7

75.0%

81.3%

75.0%

81.3%

93.8%

8

93.8%

81.3%

75.0%

93.8%

87.5%

9

68.8%

75.0%

75.0%

81.3%

75.0%

10

56.3%

56.3%

87.5%

81.3%

62.5%

Mean

66.9%

74.4%

71.3%

83.2%

81.3%

Std Dev

13.2%

10.8%

9.8%

6.6%

9.3%

  1. The 1 besides Aleph and ProGolem stands for the atom-only representation and the 2 for the amino acid representation. SVM uses a different representation (see text).