Skip to main content

Table 5 Accuracy comparison of different prediction algorithms with various parameter sets on the S-Full set

From: Analysis of energy-based algorithms for RNA secondary structure prediction

Algorithm

F-Measure

 

T99-MRF

BL*

CG*

Turner99

ubcMEA

0.582 (0.574,0.591)

0.680 (0.673,0.688)

0.636 (0.628,0.644)

n/a

ubcMFE

0.601 (0.592,0.609)

0.686 (0.678,0.694)

0.671 (0.663,0.679)

n/a

rsMEA

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.623 (0.615,0.632)

rsMFE

n/a

n/a

n/a

0.607 (0.598,0.615)

gC-pMFmeas

-

0.711 (0.704, 0.718)

-

-

  1. The table presents the prediction accuracy of different algorithms with different thermodynamic sets in terms of F-measure. The 95% percentile confidence intervals of their accuracies are also shown in parentheses. The parameter set T99-MRF refers to the Turner99 parameters in MultiRNAFold format. BL* and CG* are the parameter sets obtained by the BL and CG approaches of Andronescu et al. [9], respectively. Also, the Turner99 parameter set is the parameter set obtained by Mathews et al. [3]. "n/a" indicates cases in which a given algorithm is not applicable to a parameter set, since that does not match the energy model underlying the algorithm. The highest accuracies for MEA and MFE are shown in bold.