Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparing results between models in [[10]] and the new semiparametric model, for the data simulated under a biological model

From: Bayesian semiparametric regression models to characterize molecular evolution

  Parametric regression[10] Semiparametric regression
30 sites with largest posterior mean β ̂ i , j for h 4, 5, 6, 10, 14, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 24, 33, 48, 52, 54, 59, 62, 64, 65, 67, 71, 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 89 4, 5, 14, 18, 19, 21, 24, 33, 37, 39, 48, 52, 54, 59, 62, 64, 65, 67, 71, 72, 74, 75, 77, 80, 81, 82, 84, 85, 86, 89
30 sites with lowest posterior mean β ̂ i , j for M v 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 36, 44, 49, 51, 58, 59, 60, 61, 64, 65, 67, 79, 80, 82, 83, 85, 88 5, 6, 7, 9, 16, 18, 19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 49, 58, 59, 60, 61, 64, 65, 67, 79, 80, 83, 84, 88
  1. Sites marked in bold are the ones which are in the region of interest - for h this is where radical changes were encouraged and for M v where small changes were encouraged while generating the sequences. Underlined sites are identified by both methods.