Skip to main content

Table 1 Results of SV detection obtained by BreakDancer, MoDIL, CLEVER, CNVnator, and Pindel

From: ChopSticks: High-resolution analysis of homozygous deletions by exploiting concordant read pairs

 

Depth of coverage

SV caller

2

5

10

15

20

BreakDancer

259/260

426/427

453/456

455/458

455/458

MoDIL

1/1

27/27

96/96

129/130

–/–

CLEVER

398/462

449/525

454/491

454/478

454/466

CNVnator

326/1,258

354/952

422/1,127

447/1,211

451/1,258

Pindel

85/85

317/317

436/438

450/454

456/456

  1. Results of deletion calls by BreakDancer, MoDIL, CLEVER, CNVnator, and Pindel. The values to the left of ”/” are the numbers of correct deletion calls, where a correct deletion call is the one that overlaps with exactly one true deletion, which, in turn, only overlaps with the deletion call; the values to the right of ”/” are the numbers of all deletion calls. BreakDancer and CLEVER results were good in both sensitivity and specificity. CNVnator generated numerous false positives, while Pindel suffered from low coverage. MoDIL missed lots of deletions.