Skip to main content

Table 1 Suggested degenerate LexA binding sites for unconventional LexA targets

From: A Monte Carlo-based framework enhances the discovery and interpretation of regulatory sequence motifs

ChIP-chip score

Target gene(s)

Binding site coordinates

Binding site sequence

Mutation type

1.78

ptrA

2957002:2957021

CTATGTTTATATAACCATCA

CTG->ATG x2

1.42

otsB,otsA

1980128:1980145

ATATGTGTTT-TA-CCATTG

CTG->ATG x2, 2del

1.41

yfaX,yfaW

2359315:2359334

ATATGATCGTCTATCCAGTG

CTG->ATG x1

1.30

ydjF,ydjK

1852887:1852906

CCCTGTATCTTTTTACATCA

CTG->ATG x1

1.03

ybeR,ybeS

676025:676044

AAATGTATTTAGGTACATGC

CTG->ATG x2

1.00

ynaE

1432307:1432326

ATATGTTGACTTATACATCG

CTG->ATG x2

0.77

trs5_1,mmuP

274515:274534

GGATGTTTAGATGTCCATAC

CTG->ATG x2

  1. In the canonical LexA binding site consensus sequence, ATCTG(TA)10CAGTA, two ‘CTG’ half-site motifs in reverse compliment to each other separated by an intervening sequence of 10 nt are implicated as the most important sequence elements for protein-DNA contact. Among the MotifCatcher-suggested LexA binding site matches for unconventional (type III) sites, 7 of the 19 were defined by substituting one or both ‘CTG’ groups from the canonical consensus sequence with ‘ATG’ (1 of these 7 required an additional 2 nucleotide deletion mutation). The ChIP-chip score column (far left, taken from[35]) reflects the experimentally observed binding strength at each site. The ptr binding site sequence has been experimentally verified to bind LexA when inserted ectopically to a non-LexA-binding region[35]. Given that the other 6 sites in this list share the ‘CTG’ to ‘ATG’ mutation, it is likely that these MotifCatcher-suggested degenerate LexA binding sites also bind LexA in vivo.