Table 5 Classification results using PCA for DR prior to classification with Fisher LDA.
LTE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A2, NO(2PC) | A2, ME, NO(3PC) | A2, GL, NO(3PC) | A2, MM, NO(3PC) | A2, AG, NO(4PC) | A2, AG, MM(4PC) |
Total:100% ± 0.0 | Total:93.8% ± 3.1 | Total:82.1% ± 3.6 | Total:95.4% ± 2.2 | Total:84.6% ± 3.0 | Total:80.2% ± 2.9 |
A2:100% ± 0.0 | A2:100% ± 0.0 | A2:100.0% ± 0.0 | A2:95.0% ± 5.1 | A2:100% ± 0.0 | A2:100% ± 0.0 |
NO:100% ± 0.0 | ME:86.9% ± 6.1 | GL:75.4% ± 4.9 | MM:94.4% ± 3.1 | AG:79.7% ± 3.9 | AG:75.9% ± 4.2 |
NO:100% ± 0.0 | NO:93.2% ± 6.8 | NO:100% ± 0.0 | NO:100% ± 0.0 | MM:81.6% ± 5.2 | |
STE | |||||
A2, NO(2PC) | A2, ME, NO(3PC) | A2, GL, NO(3PC) | A2, MM, NO(3PC) | A2, AG, NO(4PC) | A2, AG, MM(4PC) |
Total:93.2% ± 3.9 | Total:90.2% ± 3.3 | Total:84.4% ± 3.2 | Total:88.1% ± 3.2 | Total:86.2% ± 2.7 | Total:81.3% ± 2.7 |
A2:86.4% ± 7.4 | A2:86.2% ± 7.5 | A2:81.4% ± 8.4 | A2:81.6% ± 8.4 | A2:72.5% ± 9.6 | A2:90.7% ± 6.4 |
NO:100% ± 0.0 | ME:91.9% ± 4.4 | GL:84.6% ± 3.8 | MM:87.8% ± 4.2 | AG:89.5% ± 2.8 | AG:80.6% ± 3.5 |
NO:91.1% ± 6.0 | NO:86.2% ± 7.5 | NO:95.5% ± 4.5 | NO:81.5% ± 8.6 | MM:79.2% ± 5.3 |