Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance of alignment-based programs

From: A comparative evaluation of sequence classification programs

Program

FACS 269 bp

MetaPhyler 300 bp

CARMA 265 bp

PhyloPythia 961 bp

Mean

Percentage of sequence classified

CARMA

29.0

93.6

68.7

61.3

63.2

MEGAN

48.4

88.2

90.5

62.2

72.3

MetaPhyler

0.2

80.9

0.5

0.6

20.6

MG-RAST

27.1

29.8

80.2

70.5

51.9

Sensitivity (percentage)

CARMA

26.7

93.4

68.5

59.8

62.1

MEGAN

42.5

87.9

90.3

61.0

70.4

MetaPhyler

0.1

80.7

0.5

0.5

20.5

MG-RAST

25.0

29.7

80.1

67.2

50.5

Precision (percentage)

CARMA

92.0

99.7

99.7

97.4

97.2

MEGAN

78.1

99.7

99.8

98.1

93.9

MetaPhyler

84.0

99.7

100.0

83.8

91.9

MG-RAST

92.4

99.8

99.9

95.3

96.9

CPU Runtime (minutes)

CARMA1,2

290880

77340

74950

360107

200819

MEGAN1,2

288020

72060

72010

351060

195788

MetaPhyler3

10

20

2

28

15

MG-RAST4

60

10080

20160

12960

10815

Memory Usage (Megabytes of RAM)

CARMA

100

100

100

120

105

MEGAN

1024

1024

1024

1410

1121

MetaPhyler

5734

5734

5734

5734

5734

MG-RAST5

-

-

-

-

-

  1. Measurements of sensitivity, precision, and resource consumption on four simulated data sets.
  2. 1analysis performed on a 2.66 GHz Intel Core i7 MacBook Pro running Mac OS X 10.7.1 with 8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3 RAM.
  3. 2BLAST v2.2.18 analysis performed using ∼200 Opteron 2425 HE (2.1GHz) cores; each node has 48G RAM.
  4. 3analysis performed on an AMD Opteron 250 (2.4 GHz) Sun Fire V40z with 32 GB RAM.
  5. 4used web service; recorded value is number of minutes to receive results, not actual CPU runtime.
  6. 5used web service; memory usage was unable to be determined.