Skip to main content

Table 1 RefSeq vs either YPS128 or Y55 : CONSERVATION

From: Mobilomics in Saccharomyces cerevisiaestrains

RefSeq vs Y55 strain

CONS

pCONSu

 

Telomere

Non-telomere

  

IN-mobil

prox-mobil

OUT-mobil

  

80.60%

11.94%

7.46%

Ty

1

ltr

191

  

Ty

16

ltr

38

8

5

Ty1

 

Ty1ltr

149

 

32

Ty1

10

Ty1ltr

22

  

Ty2

 

Ty2ltr

2

  

Ty2

4

Ty2ltr

3

  

Ty3

 

Ty3ltr

18

  

Ty3

1

Ty3ltr

7

  

Ty4

 

Ty4ltr

19

  

Ty4

1

Ty4ltr

4

  

Ty5

1

Ty5ltr

3

  

Ty5

 

Ty5ltr

2

  

RefSeq vs YPS128 strain

CONS

pCONSu

 

Telomere

Non-telomere

  

IN-mobil

prox-mobil

OUT-mobil

  

57.00%

12.00%

31.00%

Ty

1

ltr

195

  

Ty

20

ltr

37

12

31

Ty1

1

Ty1ltr

154

 

32

Ty1

10

Ty1ltr

20

  

Ty2

 

Ty2ltr

2

  

Ty2

6

Ty2ltr

4

  

Ty3

 

Ty3ltr

16

  

Ty3

1

Ty3ltr

7

  

Ty4

 

Ty4ltr

19

  

Ty4

2

Ty4ltr

4

  

Ty5

 

Ty5ltr

4

  

Ty5

1

Ty5ltr

2

  
  1. Conserved regions (CONS) and putative conserved regions with unspecified bases (pCONSu) vs annotated Ty and solo-LTR in RefSeq, when pairwise compared either to strain Y55 or strain YPS128.
  2. The pCONSu regions are classified either as telomeric or non-telomeric. Moreover, the non-telomeric regions which are conserved on RefSeq are divided in three classes, depending on their position w.r.t. annotated MGE on RefSeq: pCONSu which are labelled as “IN-mobil” correspond to annotated MGE on RefSeq; pCONSu which are labelled as “prox-mobil” are out of annotated MGE but within a distance of ±200b from annotated Ty or solo-LTR; pCONSu which are more distant are labelled as “OUT-mobil”.