Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of localization results

From: Region-based progressive localization of cell nuclei in microscopic images with data adaptive modeling

 

Dataset 1

 

R

P

A

Dice

NSD

HD

RPL

0.975

0.940

0.916

0.958

0.017

10.01

OT

0.928

0.807

0.767

0.876

0.068

17.52

KM

0.758

0.657

0.626

0.727

0.237

19.11

WS

0.974

0.915

0.893

0.945

0.022

11.21

LS

0.970

0.910

0.886

0.932

0.022

9.58

 

Dataset 2

 

R

P

A

Dice

NSD

HD

RPL

0.886

0.955

0.852

0.906

0.090

14.10

OT

0.598

0.750

0.530

0.601

0.419

36.72

KM

0.508

0.601

0.437

0.521

0.503

134.5

WS

0.714

0.817

0.636

0.789

0.337

47.67

LS

0.832

0.899

0.767

0.804

0.207

24.96

 

Dataset 3

 

R

P

A

Dice

NSD

HD

RPL

0.957

0.975

0.934

0.924

0.052

5.51

OT

0.712

0.961

0.685

0.873

0.188

31.80

KM

0.722

0.824

0.604

0.872

0.189

38.12

WS

0.584

0.989

0.575

0.819

0.335

34.53

LS

0.914

0.939

0.865

0.897

0.094

7.35

  1. Comparison between our proposed region-based progressive localization method (RPL), Otsu thresholding (OT), k-means clustering (KM), watershed (WS) and level set [52] (LS).
Back to article page

BMC Bioinformatics

ISSN: 1471-2105

Contact us