Skip to main content

Table 1 Evaluation of disassembled relations in human datasets from the literature

From: Mining differential top-k co-expression patterns from time course comparative gene expression datasets

Methods

Comparison

TP

TN

FP

FN

New

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

Undifferentiation

Comparison 1

Wild-type

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

43(0)

0.00%

N/A

0.00%

F72A/R73A

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

74(0)

Comparison 2

Wild-type

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

43(0)

  

R80A

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

32(0)

   

Constant degree

Comparison 1

Wild-type

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

9(3)

37.50%

N/A

37.50%

F72A/R73A

2(2)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

66(18)

Comparison 2

Wild-type

1(1)

0(0)

0(0)

5(3)

70(42)

  

R80A

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

0(0)

65(25)

   

Various degrees

Comparison 1

Wild-type

5

0

0

3

53

63.04%

N/A

63.04%

F72A/R73A

13

0

0

5

70

Comparison 2

Wild-type

3

0

0

5

66

  

R80A

8

0

0

4

53

   
  1. Abbreviation: TP True positive, consistent with positive gene regulation in the literature, TN True negative, consistent with negative gene regulation in the literature, FP False positive, inconsistent with negative gene regulation in the literature, FN False negative, inconsistent with positive gene regulation in the literature; Sensitivity: # of TP / (# of TP + # of FN); Specificity: # of TN / (# of TN + # of FP); Accuracy: (# of TP + # of TN) / (# of TP + # of TN + # of FP + # of FN).