Skip to main content

Table 1 Prediction performance of different classifiers for vitamin-interacting residues (VIRs)

From: Prediction of vitamin interacting residues in a vitamin binding protein using evolutionary information

Feature

    Classifier

SN

SP

ACC

MCC

 Binary

SVM (Threshold = −0.8)

68.57 ± 0.60

64.88 ± 0.18

65.22 ± 0.21

0.20 ± 0.00

SVM (Threshold = −0.5)

29.53 ± 0.83

94.71 ± 0.16

88.78 ± 0.15

0.27 ± 0.01

BayesNet

54.76 ± 1.44

69.64 ± 0.99

68.29 ± 0.85

0.15 ± 0.01

ComplementNaiveBayes

67.57 ± 0.90

65.16 ± 0.29

65.38 ± 0.33

0.19 ± 0.01

NaiveBayes

35.65 ± 0.85

89.52 ± 0.22

84.62 ± 0.18

0.22 ± 0.01

NaiveBayesMultinomial

40.08 ± 1.04

87.67 ± 0.24

83.35 ± 0.24

0.22 ± 0.01

IBk

26.67 ± 0.76

93.83 ± 0.11

87.73 ± 0.15

0.22 ± 0.01

 

RandomForest

35.48 ± 0.78

79.13 ± 0.36

75.17 ± 0.31

0.10 ± 0.01

 PSSM

SVM (Threshold = −0.8)

78.52 ± 0.64

78.61 ± 0.34

78.60 ± 0.32

0.37 ± 0.01

SVM (Threshold = −0.1)

52.19 ± 1.01

96.79 ± 0.03

92.73 ± 0.11

0.53 ± 0.01

BayesNet

67.41 ± 0.24

64.20 ± 0.06

64.49 ± 0.05

0.19 ± 0.00

ComplementNaiveBayes

61.21 ± 0.58

78.06 ± 0.23

76.53 ± 0.19

0.26 ± 0.00

NaiveBayes

67.64 ± 0.37

65.48 ± 0.11

65.68 ± 0.09

0.20 ± 0.00

NaiveBayesMultinomial

54.91 ± 0.94

83.52 ± 0.21

80.92 ± 0.16

0.28 ± 0.01

IBk

50.70 ± 0.90

96.91 ± 0.06

92.71 ± 0.08

0.52 ± 0.01

 

RandomForest

61.54 ± 0.64

81.52 ± 0.12

79.70 ± 0.11

0.30 ± 0.01

  1. *Bold value indicates highest performance with balanced sensitivity and specificity.
  2. **Italic value indicates performance with highest MCC.
  3. The values of standard errors are also given with performances.