Table 3 ROUGE scores for the summaries generated using the Section-Pos strategy

From: Evaluating the use of different positional strategies for sentence selection in biomedical literature summarization

Weights							Graph-based		Frequency-based
α	β	γ	δ	θ	σ	Π	R-2	R-SU4	R-2	R-SU4
1.0	0.0	-	-	-	-	-	0,1660	0,1334	0,1375	0,1096
		0.2	0.1	1.0	0.4	0.2	0,1635	0,1341	0,1395	0,1134
0.9	0.1	0.2	0.0	0.8	0.6	0.1	0,1752	0,1483	0,1402	0,1159
		0.2	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.1	0,1811*	0,1492*	0,1461	0,1186
		0.2	0.0	1.0	0.8	0.0	0,1758	0,1490	0,1423	0,1178
		0.2	0.1	1.0	0.4	0.2	0,1726	0,1489	0,1546	0,13254
0.8	0.2	0.2	0.0	0.8	0.6	0.1	0,1758	0,1514	0,1589	0,1332
		0.2	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.1	0,1951*	0,1610*	0,1653*	0,1352*
		0.2	0.0	1.0	0.8	0.0	0,1846*	0,1526*	0,1610*	0,1314*
		0.2	0.1	1.0	0.4	0.2	0,1613	0,1333	0,1583*	0,1298*
0.75	0.25	0.2	0.0	0.8	0.6	0.1	0,1634	0,1348	0,1598*	0,1302*
		0.2	0.0	1.0	1.0	0.1	0,1752	0,1499	0,1615*	0,1307*
		0.2	0.0	1.0	0.8	0.0	0,1688	0,1353	0,1604	0,1306

Significance is calculated with respect to the non-positional information baseline (β=0.0), and shown using the following convention: * = p <.05 and no star indicates non-significance. The best scores per summarizer are shown in bold.

Back to article page