Comparison (5-Aza) | Methods | Cuffdiff | SAMSeq | baySeq | DESeq | Noiseq |
---|
5 µM vs 0 µM | T-test | 25.8% | 22.5% | 24.5% | 25.8% | 29.7% |
 | SAM | 39.9% | 39.9% |
42.7%
|
44.5%
| 33.5% |
 | Ebayes | 39.5% | 39.5% |
42.2%
|
44.0%
| 33.3% |
10 µM vs 5 µM | T-test | 0.5% | 0.5% | 0.6% | 0.6% | 0.0% |
 | SAM | 31.1% | 30.2% | 32.6% | 34.2% | 19.4% |
 | Ebayes | 30.3% | 28.3% | 31.9% | 33.5% | 19.1% |
- The cross-platform overlap rates (%)1 were calculated between the three microarray DEG algorithms (T-test, SAM, eBayes) and the five RNA-Seq algorithms (Cuffdiff, SAMSeq, baySeq, DESeq, and NOISeq) as described in Methods. Comparisons were made to 1) measure the effect of treating HT-29 cells with 5 μM 5-Aza compared to control cells and 2) the effect of increasing the 5-Aza concentration from 5 μM to 10 μM.
- ¹The DEG overlap rates were calculated by dividing the number of overlapped DEGs over the union number of DEGs identified from both methods. Overlap rates higher than 40% are denoted in bold style.