Skip to main content

Table 5 Model testing results obtained after changing the size of the training data set and using the TR as an input feature

From: Automated classifiers for early detection and diagnosis of retinopathy in diabetic eyes

Size of the training data set

20 healthy eyes

30 healthy eyes

40 healthy eyes

TR vs. FD

GCL + IPL (eye/scans)

OPL (eye/scans)

GCL + IPL (eye/scans)

OPL (eye/scans)

GCL + IPL (eye/scans)

OPL (eye/scans)

TP

49/294

48/288

39/234

39/234

29/174

29/174

FN

5/30

6/36

5/30

5/30

5/30

5/30

TN

35/210

37/222

35/210

36/216

35/210

37/222

FP

8/48

6/36

8/48

7/42

8/48

6/36

PPV

0.86

0.89

0.83

0.85

0.78

0.83

Sensitivity

0.91

0.89

0.89

0.89

0.85

0.85

Specificity

0.81

0.86

0.81

0.84

0.81

0.86

  1. Results of sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, predictive values and positive predictive values obtained for the GCL + IPL complex and OPL when training the Bayesian radial basis function network with 20, 30 and 40 healthy eyes with the total reflectance (TR) and fractal dimension (FD) as the input and target features, respectively.