Table 2 Reported prediction performances of the models (in chronological order)

1

[7]

0.88

-

-

-

0.76

-

-

-

-

2*

[10]

0.68

0.78

0.67

-

0.42

0.56

0.85

-

-

0.75

0.75

0.82

-

0.42

0.79

0.86

-

-

3

[5]

0.84

0.91

-

-

0.67

-

-

0.82

0.85

4

[8]

0.84

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

5

[15]

0.90

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.80

0.80

6

[6]

0.75

-

-

1.69

0.39

0.65

0.76

0.73

7

[22]

0.75

0.81

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

8

[23]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

9*

[3]

0.71

-

-

-

-

0.47

0.67

-

-

0.71

-

-

-

-

0.85

0.74

-

-

10

[24]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

11

[1]

0.83

0.89

0.75

-

-

0.73

0.78

-

-

12

[20]

0.94

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

13

[17]

0.74

0.74

-

1.49

0.49

0.74

0.74

-

-

14

[25]

0.80

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

15

[19]

0.72

0.78

-

1.43

0.43

-

0.72

-

-

16

[26]

0.79

0.76

-

-

-

-

-

0.68

0. 85

17

[27]

0.74

-

-

-

-

-

-

0.57

0.81

18

[28]

0.72

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

19

[29]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

20

[30]

0.76

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

21

[16]

0.63

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

22

[31]

0.65

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

23

[18]

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

24

[9]

0.88

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-