Skip to main content

Table 8 Argument-wide SRL performance for each argument type

From: A resource-saving collective approach to biomedical semantic role labeling

Type

Description

BIOSMILE

CBIOSMILE

RCBIOSMILE

ARG0

Main arguments whose definitions depend on the corresponding predicatecp

90.20%

91.85%

92.24%

ARG1

88.43%

89.89%

90.07%

ARG2

82.85%

83.00%

82.90%

ARGM-ADV

Adverbials, these are used for syntactic elements which clearly modify the event structure of the verb in question, but which do not fall under any of the argument types above

52.41%

51.24%

53.48%

ARGM-DIS

Discourse markers, these are markers which connect a sentence to a preceding sentence

78.51%

75.73%

73.68%

ARGM-LOC

Locative modifiers indicate where some action takes place

72.15%

71.99%

71.44%

ARGM-MNR

Manner adverbs specify how an action is performed

78.09%

79.18%

79.54%

ARGM-MOD

Modals are: will, may, can, must, shall, might, should, could, would. Phrasal modals such as "going (to)", "have (to)" and "used (to)" are also included

96.21%

96.63%

97.28%

ARGM-NEG

Negation, this tag is used for elements such as "not", "n't", "never", "no longer" and other markers

96.65%

95.98%

96.52%

ARGM-TMP

Temporal markers show when an action took place

56.52%

56.30%

57.99%

Overall

 

84.14%

85.16%

85.32%