Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparing MAP of CRFref and the rankers constructed by integrating the baselines and CRFref: All baselines were improved by integrating them with CRFref, however all the integrated versions did not perform significantly better than CRFref

From: Identification of highly related references about gene-disease association

Type

Ranker

MAP

CRFref

CRFref

0.34718

CRFref & individual baselines

CRFref + PosFreq

0.35046

 

CRFref + PRE

0.34447

 

CRFref + BM25

0.34855

 

CRFref + PLM

0.34630

 

CRFref + Lucene

0.34138s

CRFref & integrative baselines

CRFref + PRE + PosFreq

0.35010

 

CRFref + BM25 + PosFreq

0.35231

 

CRFref + PLM + PosFreq

0.34974

 

CRFref + Lucene + PosFreq

0.34639

  1. s: Statistically significant differences with p ≤ 0.05