Skip to main content

Table 5 Comparing MAP of CRFref and the rankers constructed by integrating the baselines and CRFref: All baselines were improved by integrating them with CRFref, however all the integrated versions did not perform significantly better than CRFref

From: Identification of highly related references about gene-disease association

Type Ranker MAP
CRFref CRFref 0.34718
CRFref & individual baselines CRFref + PosFreq 0.35046
  CRFref + PRE 0.34447
  CRFref + BM25 0.34855
  CRFref + PLM 0.34630
  CRFref + Lucene 0.34138s
CRFref & integrative baselines CRFref + PRE + PosFreq 0.35010
  CRFref + BM25 + PosFreq 0.35231
  CRFref + PLM + PosFreq 0.34974
  CRFref + Lucene + PosFreq 0.34639
  1. s: Statistically significant differences with p ≤ 0.05