Skip to main content

Table 6 The area under the ROC curves for classification of near-native and non-native model

From: ROTAS: a rotamer-dependent, atomic statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures

 

Targets

<|P|>

<|N|>

dDFIRE

OPUS_PSP

RWplus

GOAP

ROTAS

4state_reduced

7

195

468

0.86

0.80

0.81

0.91

0.92

fisa

2

47

453

0.79

0.60

0.79

0.79

0.77

lmds

2

60

439

0.74

0.64

0.66

0.61

0.56

fisa_casp3

2

20

1672

0.74

0.58

0.72

0.68

0.70

moulder

19

151

169

0.95

0.93

0.95

0.95

0.96

rosetta

27

50

50

0.71

0.66

0.74

0.75

0.77

I-TASSER

31

229

217

0.79

0.71

0.77

0.80

0.80

Amber99

41

219

821

0.87

0.79

0.83

0.93

0.93

CASP5-8

89

14

7

0.82

0.75

0.84

0.83

0.84

Total

220

105

245

0.82

0.75

0.82

0.84

0.85

p-value

   

1.02E-04

7.70E-27

1.30E-03

2.03E-06

 
  1. <|P|>: Averaged number of positive (near-native) models in each target.
  2. <|N|>: Averaged number of negative (non-native) models in each target.
  3. p-value: P value of paired t-test of the difference of the AUC between ROTAS and the given potential.
  4. The best scores are highlighted in bold type.